Table 1

Overview of all included bankruptcy prediction studies

AuthorsEvaluated modelsBest modelSample sizePeriodAccuracy
Wilson/Sharda (1994)  MDA, NN NN 129 1975–1982 97.50% 
Lacher et al. (1995)  MDA, NN NN 282 1970–1989 91.50% 
Alici (1996)  Kohonen network Kohonen network 92 1987–1992 N.A. 
Kim (2005)  NN NN 654 N.A. 80.00% 
Huang et al. (2008)  DT, MDA, NN, Adapted NN (incl. ratio calculation of input features) Adapted NN 660 2004 97.87% 
Tsai/Wu (2008)  NN ensemble NN ensemble 690 N.A. 97.32% 
Shi et al. (2009)  DT, NN, NN, Adapted NN (incl. bagging), Nearest Neighbour, SVM, ZeroR Adapted NN 1,000 N.A. 75.60% 
Lu et al. (2015)  SVM, Hybrid model (SVM + SPSO) Hybrid model 250 N.A. 99.21% 
Antunes et al. (2017)  Gaussian process, LR, SVM SVM 2,000 2002–2006 98.13% 
Kostopoulos et al. (2017)  BN, NN, RF, SVM RF 435 2003–2005 70.19% 
Alexandropoulos et al. (2019)  LR, NB, NN NN 450 2003–2004 73.20% 
Ding et al. (2019)  K-Medians Clustering, SAE K-Medians Clustering 97,680 1996–2016 88.46% 
Jones/Wang (2019)  LR, TreeNet TreeNet 4,922,271 2009–2013 90.40% 
Mai et al. (2019)  CNN, Adapted CNN (incl. word embedding), LR, RF, SVM Adapted CNN 106,821 1994–2014 85.60% 
Rainarli (2019)  DT, LR, NB, Nearest Neighbour, NN, SVM, ZeroR SVM 120 2008–2014 85.83% 
Cao et al. (2020)  BN, DT, LR, NN, SVM NN 1,563,010 1961–2018 83.72% 
Jang et al. (2020)  LSTM LSTM 1,378 1980–2016 98.54% 
Soui et al. (2020)  AB, LD, LR, NN, RF, SAE, SVM, XGBoost SAE 10,503 2007–2013 98.00% 
Uthayakumar et al. (2020)  Ant colony optimization, LR, NN, RBF, RF Ant colony optimization 250 N.A. 100.00% 
Sehgal et al. (2021)  LR, NN, SVM SVM 1,957 2010–2016 83.60% 
AuthorsEvaluated modelsBest modelSample sizePeriodAccuracy
Wilson/Sharda (1994)  MDA, NN NN 129 1975–1982 97.50% 
Lacher et al. (1995)  MDA, NN NN 282 1970–1989 91.50% 
Alici (1996)  Kohonen network Kohonen network 92 1987–1992 N.A. 
Kim (2005)  NN NN 654 N.A. 80.00% 
Huang et al. (2008)  DT, MDA, NN, Adapted NN (incl. ratio calculation of input features) Adapted NN 660 2004 97.87% 
Tsai/Wu (2008)  NN ensemble NN ensemble 690 N.A. 97.32% 
Shi et al. (2009)  DT, NN, NN, Adapted NN (incl. bagging), Nearest Neighbour, SVM, ZeroR Adapted NN 1,000 N.A. 75.60% 
Lu et al. (2015)  SVM, Hybrid model (SVM + SPSO) Hybrid model 250 N.A. 99.21% 
Antunes et al. (2017)  Gaussian process, LR, SVM SVM 2,000 2002–2006 98.13% 
Kostopoulos et al. (2017)  BN, NN, RF, SVM RF 435 2003–2005 70.19% 
Alexandropoulos et al. (2019)  LR, NB, NN NN 450 2003–2004 73.20% 
Ding et al. (2019)  K-Medians Clustering, SAE K-Medians Clustering 97,680 1996–2016 88.46% 
Jones/Wang (2019)  LR, TreeNet TreeNet 4,922,271 2009–2013 90.40% 
Mai et al. (2019)  CNN, Adapted CNN (incl. word embedding), LR, RF, SVM Adapted CNN 106,821 1994–2014 85.60% 
Rainarli (2019)  DT, LR, NB, Nearest Neighbour, NN, SVM, ZeroR SVM 120 2008–2014 85.83% 
Cao et al. (2020)  BN, DT, LR, NN, SVM NN 1,563,010 1961–2018 83.72% 
Jang et al. (2020)  LSTM LSTM 1,378 1980–2016 98.54% 
Soui et al. (2020)  AB, LD, LR, NN, RF, SAE, SVM, XGBoost SAE 10,503 2007–2013 98.00% 
Uthayakumar et al. (2020)  Ant colony optimization, LR, NN, RBF, RF Ant colony optimization 250 N.A. 100.00% 
Sehgal et al. (2021)  LR, NN, SVM SVM 1,957 2010–2016 83.60% 

AB = AdaBoost; BN = Bayesian Network; CNN = Convolutional Neural Network; DT = Decision Tree; LD = Linear Discriminant Analysis; LR = Logistic Regression; LSTM = Long Short-Term Memory; MDA = Multivariate Discriminant Analysis; NB = Naïve Bayes; NN = Neural Network; RBF = Radial Basis Function; RF = Random Forest; SAE = Stacked Auto Encoder; SPSO = Switching Particle Swarm Optimization; SVM = Support Vector Machine

Source(s): Table created by author

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal