Principal component analysis results
| Factor | Measurement items | Loading | α |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivation | Mo1- Need to digitize processes | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Mo2- Establishing effective communication in company | 0.71 | ||
| Mo3- Creating new innovative processes | 0.73 | ||
| Selected LSS methods | Me1- Normal probability plot | 0.85 | 0.82 |
| Me2- Analysis of variance | 0.76 | ||
| Me3- Regression/statistical hypothesis testing | 0.69 | ||
| Challenges | C1- Wrong selection of projects at start of LSS initiative | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| C2- Unfavorable identification of projects | 0.88 | ||
| C3- Identification of suitable projects | 0.61 | ||
| LSS program performance | L1- Willingness to cooperate in further LSS projects | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| L2- Growth of scope of LSS initiative | 0.71 | ||
| L3- Acquiring/training new LSS experts | 0.69 | ||
| Organizational performance | O1- Internal customers’ satisfaction | 0.67 | 0.80 |
| O2- Delivering value to internal customers | 0.73 | ||
| O3- Delivering what internal customers want | 0.63 |
| Factor | Measurement items | Loading | α |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivation | Mo1- Need to digitize processes | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Mo2- Establishing effective communication in company | 0.71 | ||
| Mo3- Creating new innovative processes | 0.73 | ||
| Selected LSS methods | Me1- Normal probability plot | 0.85 | 0.82 |
| Me2- Analysis of variance | 0.76 | ||
| Me3- Regression/statistical hypothesis testing | 0.69 | ||
| Challenges | C1- Wrong selection of projects at start of LSS initiative | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| C2- Unfavorable identification of projects | 0.88 | ||
| C3- Identification of suitable projects | 0.61 | ||
| LSS program performance | L1- Willingness to cooperate in further LSS projects | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| L2- Growth of scope of LSS initiative | 0.71 | ||
| L3- Acquiring/training new LSS experts | 0.69 | ||
| Organizational performance | O1- Internal customers’ satisfaction | 0.67 | 0.80 |
| O2- Delivering value to internal customers | 0.73 | ||
| O3- Delivering what internal customers want | 0.63 |
Note(s): Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of sampling adequacy = 0.79 (“Middling”; Kaiser and Rice, 1974)
Bartlett's test of Sphericity shows that the result is significant at 0.00 which shows that the matrix is not an identity matrix and the variables relate enough to run a meaningful PCA
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.