Table 2 Hypotheses testing Hypothesis... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

Hypotheses testing

Hypothesis	Relationship	Std. Beta	Std. Dev	t-value	p-value	BCI LL	BCI UL	f²	Decision
H1	Effort Expectancy → REQ	0.161	0.032	5.053	p < 0.001	0.110	0.214	0.04	Supported
H2	Performance Expectancy → REQ	0.327	0.036	9.105	p < 0.001	0.269	0.386	0.13	Supported
H3	Technology Anxiety → REQ	−0.083	0.024	3.513	p < 0.001	−0.120	−0.042	0.02	Supported
H4	Positive Emotions → REQ	0.338	0.037	9.255	p < 0.001	0.277	0.399	0.15	Supported
H5	Subjective Norms → REQ	0.093	0.029	3.265	0.001	0.046	0.139	0.02	Supported

Hypothesis	Relationship	Std. Beta	Std. Dev	t-value	p-value	BCI LL	BCI UL	f²	Decision
H1	Effort Expectancy → REQ	0.161	0.032	5.053	p < 0.001	0.110	0.214	0.04	Supported
H2	Performance Expectancy → REQ	0.327	0.036	9.105	p < 0.001	0.269	0.386	0.13	Supported
H3	Technology Anxiety → REQ	−0.083	0.024	3.513	p < 0.001	−0.120	−0.042	0.02	Supported
H4	Positive Emotions → REQ	0.338	0.037	9.255	p < 0.001	0.277	0.399	0.15	Supported
H5	Subjective Norms → REQ	0.093	0.029	3.265	0.001	0.046	0.139	0.02	Supported

Note(s): REQ = willingness to use SR for making service requests; f² = effect size

Source(s): Authors’ own creation