Table of the top three deployment risk factors by risk family
| Risk family | Risk code | Risk factor | Risk value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance risks (CMP) | CMPP4R5 | Donor standards for recipient monitoring and validation | 39.93 |
| CMPP5R5 | Donor standards for recipient monitoring and validation | 37.14 | |
| CMPP4R9 | Failure to respect humanitarian action principles | 36.73 | |
| Operational risks (OPL) | OPLP4R7 | Fragility of oil support, despite its vital importance for the mobility and functioning of the entire logistics chain | 50.77 |
| OPLP4R8 | Denial of access to the population by an armed force (militia or government) | 48.55 | |
| OPLP5R6 | Fragility of oil support, despite its vital importance for the mobility and functioning of the entire logistics chain | 47.37 | |
| Procurement risks (PRO) | PROP4R5 | Incapacity to deliver timely and relevant services | 17.31 |
| PROP4R3 | Weak cross-functional relationships with populations and failure to integrate diverse local staff into the humanitarian support planning process | 17.25 | |
| PROP4R1 | Difficulty in establishing quality programs that address the most pressing and responsive needs of the community | 16.91 | |
| Brand reputation risks (BRD) | BRDP4R4 | Luck of reverence for certain religious, tribal and community figures who have a strong local influence | 55.50 |
| BRDP5R4 | Luck of reverence for certain religious, tribal and community figures who have a strong local influence | 55.30 | |
| BRDP4R5 | Failure to respect humanitarian action values and codes | 37.87 | |
| Safety risks (SAF) | SAFP4R5 | Weak threat assessment and analysis | 31.67 |
| SAFP5R4 | Weak threat assessment and analysis | 29.38 | |
| SAFP4R9 | Eschewing armed protection wherever possible | 27.16 | |
| Security risks (SEC) | SECP4R8 | Ambushes of humanitarian convoys and forced detour of humanitarian aid | 72.14 |
| SECP4R15 | Underestimation of soft skills such as negotiation, communication, conflict resolution techniques and clear mission statement | 66.89 | |
| SECP4R24 | Strong presence of foreign militias and mercenaries | 66.73 | |
| Staffing risks (STF) | STFP4R1 | Difficulty for country offices to recruit and retain qualified and competent security staff with diverse backgrounds | 24.79 |
| STFP5R1 | Standard operating procedures (SOP) do not distinguish between criminality and political violence | 22.29 | |
| STFP3R2 | Complexity of applying “filtering” and “vetting” processes to all new workers and volunteers | 20.93 | |
| Technical risks (TEC) | TECP4R5 | Scarcity of operational and reliable gas stations | 47.76 |
| TECP5R5 | Scarcity of operational and reliable gas stations | 44.22 | |
| TECP4R4 | Lack of coverage by mobile network and internet operators | 43.09 |
| Risk family | Risk code | Risk factor | Risk value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance risks | CMPP4R5 | Donor standards for recipient monitoring and validation | 39.93 |
| CMPP5R5 | Donor standards for recipient monitoring and validation | 37.14 | |
| CMPP4R9 | Failure to respect humanitarian action principles | 36.73 | |
| Operational risks | OPLP4R7 | Fragility of oil support, despite its vital importance for the mobility and functioning of the entire logistics chain | 50.77 |
| OPLP4R8 | Denial of access to the population by an armed force (militia or government) | 48.55 | |
| OPLP5R6 | Fragility of oil support, despite its vital importance for the mobility and functioning of the entire logistics chain | 47.37 | |
| Procurement risks | PROP4R5 | Incapacity to deliver timely and relevant services | 17.31 |
| PROP4R3 | Weak cross-functional relationships with populations and failure to integrate diverse local staff into the humanitarian support planning process | 17.25 | |
| PROP4R1 | Difficulty in establishing quality programs that address the most pressing and responsive needs of the community | 16.91 | |
| Brand reputation risks | BRDP4R4 | Luck of reverence for certain religious, tribal and community figures who have a strong local influence | 55.50 |
| BRDP5R4 | Luck of reverence for certain religious, tribal and community figures who have a strong local influence | 55.30 | |
| BRDP4R5 | Failure to respect humanitarian action values and codes | 37.87 | |
| Safety risks | SAFP4R5 | Weak threat assessment and analysis | 31.67 |
| SAFP5R4 | Weak threat assessment and analysis | 29.38 | |
| SAFP4R9 | Eschewing armed protection wherever possible | 27.16 | |
| Security risks | SECP4R8 | Ambushes of humanitarian convoys and forced detour of humanitarian aid | 72.14 |
| SECP4R15 | Underestimation of soft skills such as negotiation, communication, conflict resolution techniques and clear mission statement | 66.89 | |
| SECP4R24 | Strong presence of foreign militias and mercenaries | 66.73 | |
| Staffing risks | STFP4R1 | Difficulty for country offices to recruit and retain qualified and competent security staff with diverse backgrounds | 24.79 |
| STFP5R1 | Standard operating procedures (SOP) do not distinguish between criminality and political violence | 22.29 | |
| STFP3R2 | Complexity of applying “filtering” and “vetting” processes to all new workers and volunteers | 20.93 | |
| Technical risks | TECP4R5 | Scarcity of operational and reliable gas stations | 47.76 |
| TECP5R5 | Scarcity of operational and reliable gas stations | 44.22 | |
| TECP4R4 | Lack of coverage by mobile network and internet operators | 43.09 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.