Results of the causal study in the sense of Granger alternative measures dividends to sales ratio and Kothari et al. (2005) model
| Variable | DPO | DA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | t-Statistic | Coefficient | t-Statistic | |
| DA (−1) | 0.944** | 1.992 | 0.079 | 0.581 |
| DPO (−1) | −0.544** | −2.216 | 0.283* | 1.864 |
| DEBT | −0.174 | −0.389 | −0.132 | −1.036 |
| SIZE | −0.196 | −1.433 | 0.020 | 0.402 |
| GROW | −0.100 | −1.236 | −0.004 | −0.731 |
| CFO | 0.640 | 1.176 | 0.548*** | 4.312 |
| RSQ | 0.004** | 2.258 | −0.000 | −0.646 |
| ACEXP | 0.000 | 0.723 | −0.000 | −1.310 |
| ACIND | −0.003 | −1.026 | 0.000 | 0.450 |
| NUMB | 0.023 | 0.982 | 0.004 | 1.189 |
| No. of observations | 1,561 | 1,561 | ||
| Hansen j-test (p-value) | 12.149 (0.352) | 10.161 (0.515) | ||
| AR(2) test (p-value) | −0.676 (0.499) | −0.534 (0.593) | ||
| Variable | DPO | DA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | t-Statistic | Coefficient | t-Statistic | |
| DA (−1) | 0.944** | 1.992 | 0.079 | 0.581 |
| DPO (−1) | −0.544** | −2.216 | 0.283* | 1.864 |
| DEBT | −0.174 | −0.389 | −0.132 | −1.036 |
| SIZE | −0.196 | −1.433 | 0.020 | 0.402 |
| GROW | −0.100 | −1.236 | −0.004 | −0.731 |
| CFO | 0.640 | 1.176 | 0.548*** | 4.312 |
| RSQ | 0.004** | 2.258 | −0.000 | −0.646 |
| ACEXP | 0.000 | 0.723 | −0.000 | −1.310 |
| ACIND | −0.003 | −1.026 | 0.000 | 0.450 |
| NUMB | 0.023 | 0.982 | 0.004 | 1.189 |
| No. of observations | 1,561 | 1,561 | ||
| Hansen j-test ( | 12.149 (0.352) | 10.161 (0.515) | ||
| AR(2) test ( | −0.676 (0.499) | −0.534 (0.593) | ||
Note(s): *Significance at 10% level; **significance at 5% level and ***significance at 1% level
Source(s): Own elaboration
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.