Table 8 Path coefficient result... | Emerald Publishing

Table 8

Path coefficient result

Hypotheses		Beta/OS	Confidence interval 95% bias corrected		T	P	Decision
Hypotheses		Beta/OS	LL	UL	T	P	Decision
H1	Achievement → Job Satisfaction	0.400	0.199	0.660	3.341	0.001**	Supported
H2	Advancement → Job Satisfaction	0.144	0.043	0.245	2.675	0.008**	Supported
H3	Recognition → Job Satisfaction	0.109	−0.007	0.202	2.044	0.042*	Supported
H4	Growth → Job Satisfaction	0.138	0.023	0.264	2.228	0.026*	Supported
H5	Company Policies → Job Satisfaction	0.168	0.035	0.301	2.430	0.015*	Supported
H6	Re_Peer → Job Satisfaction	0.109	0.003	0.207	2.084	0.038*	Supported
H7	Work Security → Job Satisfaction	0.066	−0.065	0.184	1.019	0.309	Not Supported
H8	Re_Supervisor → Job Satisfaction	0.191	0.034	0.383	2.105	0.036*	Supported
H9	Job Satisfaction → Auditors Performance	0.343	0.184	0.500	4.221	0.000**	Supported

Hypotheses		Beta/OS	Confidence interval 95% bias corrected		T	P	Decision
Hypotheses		Beta/OS	LL	UL	T	P	Decision
H1	Achievement → Job Satisfaction	0.400	0.199	0.660	3.341	0.001**	Supported
H2	Advancement → Job Satisfaction	0.144	0.043	0.245	2.675	0.008**	Supported
H3	Recognition → Job Satisfaction	0.109	−0.007	0.202	2.044	0.042*	Supported
H4	Growth → Job Satisfaction	0.138	0.023	0.264	2.228	0.026*	Supported
H5	Company Policies → Job Satisfaction	0.168	0.035	0.301	2.430	0.015*	Supported
H6	Re_Peer → Job Satisfaction	0.109	0.003	0.207	2.084	0.038*	Supported
H7	Work Security → Job Satisfaction	0.066	−0.065	0.184	1.019	0.309	Not Supported
H8	Re_Supervisor → Job Satisfaction	0.191	0.034	0.383	2.105	0.036*	Supported
H9	Job Satisfaction → Auditors Performance	0.343	0.184	0.500	4.221	0.000**	Supported

Note(s): Significant: **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05

Source(s): Table by author