Table 2

Fit statistics from measurement model comparison

Modelsχ2 (df)CFIRMSEASRMRΔχ2Δdf
Full measurement model1580.27 (575)0.900.050.05  
Model Aa2375.41 (581)0.830.070.08795.146***
Model Bb1854.41 (579)0.880.060.06274.144***
Model Cc2756.37 (581)0.790.080.081176.106***
Model Dd3081.15 (584)0.760.080.091500.889***
Model Ee4287.78 (584)0.640.100.122707.519***
Model Ff2753.33 (582)0.790.080.071173.067***
Model Gg
(Harman's single factor test)
5795.28 (590)0.490.120.134215.0115***

Note(s): ***p < 0.001; χ2 = chi-square discrepancy; df = degrees of freedom; IFI = Incremental Fit Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; Δχ2χdiff2 = difference in chi-square, Δdf dfdiff = difference in degrees of freedom. All models were compared to the full measurement model

a = Employee trust and relational coordination combined into a single factor

b = Transformational leadership and employee trust combined into a single factor

c = Transformational leadership and relational coordination combined into a single factor

d = Transformational leadership, employee trust and relational coordination combined into a single factor

e = Relational coordination and school performance combined into a single factor

f = Employee trust and school performance combined into a single factor

g = All factors combined into a single factor

Source(s): Authors’ work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal