Table 2. Descriptive statistics for and...

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for and correlations

Variable	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1. Language effect^a	0.51	0.50
2. Framing effect^b	0.51	0.50	0.01
3. Average offer	4,562.76	2,381.32	−0.08	−0.22**
4. Positive affect	2.85	1.04	−0.06	0.18**	−0.14*
5. Negative affect	2.64	1.11	−0.05	−0.29**	0.09	−0.38**
6. Average subjective value^c	3.51	1.08	0.07	0.08	−0.03	0.61**	−0.33**
7. Offer satisfaction	3.26	1.44	0.04	0.04	0.02	0.56**	−0.38**	0.83**
8. Process satisfaction	3.80	1.24	0.05	0.04	0.00	0.32**	−0.12	0.78**	0.43**
9. Relationship satisfaction	3.48	1.28	0.10	0.12	−0.10	0.63**	−0.29**	0.85**	0.57**	0.54**

Variable	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1. Language effect^a	0.51	0.50
2. Framing effect^b	0.51	0.50	0.01
3. Average offer	4,562.76	2,381.32	−0.08	−0.22**
4. Positive affect	2.85	1.04	−0.06	0.18**	−0.14*
5. Negative affect	2.64	1.11	−0.05	−0.29**	0.09	−0.38**
6. Average subjective value^c	3.51	1.08	0.07	0.08	−0.03	0.61**	−0.33**
7. Offer satisfaction	3.26	1.44	0.04	0.04	0.02	0.56**	−0.38**	0.83**
8. Process satisfaction	3.80	1.24	0.05	0.04	0.00	0.32**	−0.12	0.78**	0.43**
9. Relationship satisfaction	3.48	1.28	0.10	0.12	−0.10	0.63**	−0.29**	0.85**	0.57**	0.54**

Notes:

M and SD are used to represent mean and standard deviation, respectively. ^aLanguage manipulation (0 = Native language condition; 1 = Foreign language condition). ^bFraming manipulation (0 = Negative [loss] frame; 1 = Positive [gain] frame). ^cAverage subjective value is the average of three dimensions of subjective value – offer satisfaction; process satisfaction and relationship satisfaction. * indicates p < 0.05. ** indicates p < 0.01

Source: Derived from the statistical analysis of this study (R version 4.2.2)

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable