Table A2

Actors dynamics in the analytical structures

Analytical structureActors dynamicsResult
Granstrand and Holgersson (2020) 
  • -

    Complementary/substitute relationships with each other

  • -

    A system of actors that relate collaboratively and competitively, with or without the focal company, connected through input and output flows together to deliver a value proposition

  • -

    A sharing of technologies, essential in the creation and capture of value within and between sets of actors

  • -

    Cases emphasize complementary (collaboration) and substitute (competition) relationships

Innovative performance for the actors
Talmar et al. (2020) 
  • -

    Constructions and relationships relevant to the representation of the functioning of an innovation ecosystem

  • -

    Relevant properties (interdependence, complementarities, and alignment risks)

  • -

    Constructs and their relationships were defined at the ecosystem level (value proposition, user segments, and actors) and at the actor level (resources, activities, value addition, value capture, dependency, and risk)

  • -

    Alignment of actors based on the value proposition

  • -

    Creating more excellent value, exploring the synergies and effects of complementarities between actors

Benitez et al. (2020) 
  • -

    Actors who need to interact to co-create value and relate in different ways according to the evolutionary stage of the innovation ecosystem

  • -

    Self-organized or managed with multilayer networks of actors with other attributes, seeking to provide a system of innovative products and services

  • -

    Companies with diffuse technological capabilities or aligned around industry platforms

  • -

    Theory of Social Exchanges: trust, reciprocity, the expectation of mutual benefits from voluntary value exchanges, obligations between the parties involvedetc.

  • -

    Structure-guided by platforms or technologies that drive relationships for the co-creation of value

  • -

    A variety of actors creates symbiosis and synergies to create a higher level of value than those without these interconnections

Gomes et al. (2021) 
  • -

    The ecosystem as a meta-organization, composed of a group of actors that pursue a collective goal at the system level, the focal value proposition

  • -

    Heterogeneous set of independent actors, but at the same time interdependent, who are “limited” by complementarities

  • -

    Different collaboration and competition dynamics between ecosystem members and the external environment

  • -

    The meta-organization (ecosystem) emerges when the actors' activities must be aligned based on a collective identity to create value (systemic innovation)

The performance of the ecosystem (value proposition – systemic innovation) presents it as a meta-organization that must be managed based on three visions: process, configuration, and competitive vision
Dedehayir et al. (2022) 
  • - They understand innovation ecosystems as the process of incorporation and connection of actors within an evolving ecosystem structure, with an emphasis on the emergence process

  • - They propose a focus on the roles played, whereby the dynamics of the actors will be linked to the different parts they can assume throughout the evolution of the ecosystem

  • -

    Emergence of an innovation ecosystem that develops a proposal, generating complementarities and value creation

Source(s): The authors based on Granstrand and Holgersson (2020), Talmar et al. (2020) and Benitez et al. (2020), Gomes et al. (2021), and Dedehayir et al. (2022) 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal