Assessment criteria based on selected literature (Conceptual assessment tool)
| Category | Criteria | Sub-criteria | Literature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keast and hampson | Dietrich, eskerod et al | Keung and Shen | Suprapto, M | |||
| Individual collaborative capacity (ICC) | Attitudes and motivations | Commitment to devote skills, knowledge, and resources | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Attitudes about other project participants | Having a collaborative culture rather than a competitive culture | ✓ | ||||
| Trust personally each other | ✓ | |||||
| Ability to work with others | Deal constructively with conflict | ✓ | ||||
| Relational collaborative capacity (RCC) | Working climate | Cohesion | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Involve the relevant members | ✓ | |||||
| Stressing the benefit of working together | ✓ | |||||
| Mutual trust between organizations | ✓ | |||||
| Support the champions of the collaborative project | ✓ | |||||
| Supporting each other | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Existence of mutual flexibility | ✓ | |||||
| Welcome new information and innovative ideas | ✓ | |||||
| Shared vision | Mutual understanding of the goals, related activities and interdependencies between the activities | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Establish a common vision and mission | ✓ | |||||
| Have joint working processes | ✓ | |||||
| Alignment of contributions provided by collaborating actors with the expectations of the contributions | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Knowledge sharing | Encouraging the collection and dissemination of knowledge among members | ✓ | ||||
| The willingness and ability to transfer explicit and tacit knowledge | ✓ | |||||
| Gaining and applying new knowledge from the representatives of other organizations | ✓ | |||||
| Relationship continuity | The level of engagement of the organizations in various steps of the project | ✓ | ||||
| Continue the relationship in future | ✓ | |||||
| Value diversity | Understand and examine the perspectives of others | ✓ | ||||
| Understand the cultural differences between organizations | ✓ | |||||
| Organizational collaborative capacity (OCC) | Leadership | Connecting the members to the network and driving the relationship to achieve outcomes by senior management | ✓ | |||
| Commitment of senior management to support the collaboration | ✓ | |||||
| Actively work of senior management together to resolve potential conflicts | ✓ | |||||
| Communication | Have a free flow of communication between all members | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Have a system to facilitate high volumes of information sharing | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| The ability of collaborative actors to share their ideas openly | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| The frequency of communication | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Formalized procedures | Clear roles and responsibilities of team members | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Clear procedures and guidelines of processes in a collaborative work | ✓ | |||||
| Clear values, norms and rules | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Improved orientation | Monitor actions, needs and resources to meet common goals | ✓ | ||||
| Category | Criteria | Sub-criteria | Literature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keast and hampson | Dietrich, eskerod | Keung and Shen | Suprapto, M | |||
| Individual collaborative capacity (ICC) | Attitudes and motivations | Commitment to devote skills, knowledge, and resources | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Attitudes about other project participants | Having a collaborative culture rather than a competitive culture | ✓ | ||||
| Trust personally each other | ✓ | |||||
| Ability to work with others | Deal constructively with conflict | ✓ | ||||
| Relational collaborative capacity (RCC) | Working climate | Cohesion | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Involve the relevant members | ✓ | |||||
| Stressing the benefit of working together | ✓ | |||||
| Mutual trust between organizations | ✓ | |||||
| Support the champions of the collaborative project | ✓ | |||||
| Supporting each other | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Existence of mutual flexibility | ✓ | |||||
| Welcome new information and innovative ideas | ✓ | |||||
| Shared vision | Mutual understanding of the goals, related activities and interdependencies between the activities | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Establish a common vision and mission | ✓ | |||||
| Have joint working processes | ✓ | |||||
| Alignment of contributions provided by collaborating actors with the expectations of the contributions | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Knowledge sharing | Encouraging the collection and dissemination of knowledge among members | ✓ | ||||
| The willingness and ability to transfer explicit and tacit knowledge | ✓ | |||||
| Gaining and applying new knowledge from the representatives of other organizations | ✓ | |||||
| Relationship continuity | The level of engagement of the organizations in various steps of the project | ✓ | ||||
| Continue the relationship in future | ✓ | |||||
| Value diversity | Understand and examine the perspectives of others | ✓ | ||||
| Understand the cultural differences between organizations | ✓ | |||||
| Organizational collaborative capacity (OCC) | Leadership | Connecting the members to the network and driving the relationship to achieve outcomes by senior management | ✓ | |||
| Commitment of senior management to support the collaboration | ✓ | |||||
| Actively work of senior management together to resolve potential conflicts | ✓ | |||||
| Communication | Have a free flow of communication between all members | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Have a system to facilitate high volumes of information sharing | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| The ability of collaborative actors to share their ideas openly | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| The frequency of communication | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Formalized procedures | Clear roles and responsibilities of team members | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Clear procedures and guidelines of processes in a collaborative work | ✓ | |||||
| Clear values, norms and rules | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Improved orientation | Monitor actions, needs and resources to meet common goals | ✓ | ||||
Source(s): Authors own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.