Table A1

Indicative studies in servitization with respect to business model innovation and the role of intermediaries

StudyStudy objectives/focusResearch methodData collection periodScope of innovationSegmentKey actors analyzedRole of intermediariesKey findings/outcomes
Ayala et al. (2017) Understand how manufacturing compnaies integrate knowledge from service suppliers for servitization-driven BMIMultiple case studySix monthsReconfigure existing products and introduce new offeringsB2BSuppliersProvide knowledge and expertise to the OEMIdentify the intensity of knowledge transformation in different configurations of collaboration for servitization-driven BMI
Burton et al. (2016) Identify types and sources of tensions in the servitization process and explore how they might be mitigatedInterviews with key actors at servitizing firms, their customers, and intermediariesN/ADevelop new offeringsB2B
  • (1)

    Customers

  • (2)

    Distributors

Service delivery
  • (1)

    Servitization presents an opportunity for manufacturing firms to access new sources of revenue and expand their reach in the value chain

  • (2)

    Tensions are inherent in the process of servitization and can arise between organizational actors and among individual actors

Huikkola et al. (2020) Demonstrate how servitization impacts the boundaries of manufacturers' firmsMultiple case studySeventeen yearsReconfigure existing offeringsB2B
  • (1)

    Focal firm

  • (2)

    Customers

  • (3)

    Suppliers

Facilitate services deliveryDemonstrates how servitization influences the boundaries of firms by considering aspects such as identity, capability, power, and efficiency. It highlights the dynamic interaction among these factors and offers a managerial framework for effectively defining firm boundaries in the context of servitization
Jovanovic et al. (2019) Develop service capabilities in the context of the internal service ecosystemMultiple embedded cases in a single organizationN/AReconfigure existing offerings and introduce new onesB2BSubsidiariesFacilitate services deliveryReveal a complex picture of capability development across subsidiaries, emphasizing the importance of front-office capabilities and standardization
Kowalkowski et al. (2016) Develop and evolve context-specific value propositions in service systemsLongitudinal case studyTen yearsIntroduce a new offeringB2B
  • (1)

    Manufacturer

  • (2)

    Dealers

  • (3)

    Users

(1) Perform maintenance
(2) Optimize machine fleets
Highlight the importance of triadic value proposition in industrial contexts for successful service-led growth
Lin et al. (2016) Explore how intermediaries influence innovation outcomesSurveySingle point in timeIntroduce new offeringsB2B
  • (1)

    Technology providers

  • (2)

    Financial service firms

Facilitate knowledge transferHighlight that ties with intermediaries positively influence innovation performance
Parida and Jovanovic (2022) Investigate how global manufacturers and service network partners redefine roles for advanced service provisionMultiple case studyN/AIntroduce new offeringsB2BFront-end service network partners
  • (1)

    Support customer satisfaction

  • (2)

    Specialized capabilities

Identify value co-creation challenges in the global service network
Reim et al. (2019) Analyze the role of distributors in servitization to understand their mediation between providers and customersMultiple case studyN/AReconfigure existing offerings and introduce new onesB2BDistributorsFacilitate communication between providers and customersIdentify major capability and market-related challenges faced by service network actors, hindering their transformation
Sjödin et al. (2020) Analyze BMI for outcome-based services in three phases: value proposition definition, value provision design and value-in-use deliveryMultiple case studyN/AIntroduce new offeringsB2B
  • (1)

    Customers

  • (2)

    Partners

Continuously realign incentivesPresent a shift in business models, examine both successful and unsuccessful cases, and provide insights into the alignment of value creation and value capture processes
Sjödin et al. (2022) Understand how manufacturers orchestrate ecosystems for digital BMIMultiple case studyN/AReconfigure existing offeringsB2BEcosystem partnersOptimize customer offeringsEmphasize the complexity and challenges of orchestrating ecosystems for digital BMI
Story et al. (2017) Investigate the capabilities for successful servitization for advanced servicesInterviews with actors from multiple industriesN/ACreate new offerings and reconfigure existing onesB2BNot specifiedProvide multi-vendor technologyIdentify six key business activities within which advanced services capabilities are grouped
Visnjic et al. (2022) Investigate the processes of firms shifting towards a dual orientation, delineate the practices employed, and suggest a sequence and pace of these practices as they unfold over timeMultiple case studiesFour yearsIntroduce new offeringsB2B
  • (1)

    Manufacturer

  • (2)

    Subsidiaries

Facilitate sale of offeringsSuggest that beginning with less complex practices and gradually advancing to more sophisticated ones is an effective approach to handling a dual orientation
This studyAnalyze how a manufacturing firm can implement a scalable subscription business model for B2C and B2B customers alongside its existing product-centric modelLongitudinal case studyThree yearsIntroduce new offeringsB2B and B2C
  • (1)

    Manufacturer

  • (2)

    Dealers

Assist customers in their subscription processes and perform service activitiesAffirms the importance of organizational learning, the potential for value creation through subscriptions and highlights key challenges in value co-creation between manufacturers and channel intermediaries

Source(s): The above table was created by the authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal