Likert scale interpretation
| Likert scale interpretation and distribution of values | Interpretation of Rogers' Innovation adoption classification based on 5-point Likert Scale | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Likert scale | Description | Value allocation | Value range allocation | Rogers' innovation adoption status |
| 1 | Not at all | 1.0–1.49 | 0.1–1.0 | Laggard |
| 2 | Slightly true | 1.5–2.49 | 1.1–2.0 | Late majority |
| 3 | Moderately true | 2.5–3.90 | 2.1–3.0 | Early majority |
| 4 | Mostly true | 3.5–4.49 | 3.1–4.0 | Early adopters |
| 5 | Completely true | 4.5–5.00 | 4.1–5.0 | Innovators |
| Likert scale interpretation and distribution of values | Interpretation of Rogers' Innovation adoption classification based on 5-point Likert Scale | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Likert scale | Description | Value allocation | Value range allocation | Rogers' innovation adoption status |
| 1 | Not at all | 1.0–1.49 | 0.1–1.0 | Laggard |
| 2 | Slightly true | 1.5–2.49 | 1.1–2.0 | Late majority |
| 3 | Moderately true | 2.5–3.90 | 2.1–3.0 | Early majority |
| 4 | Mostly true | 3.5–4.49 | 3.1–4.0 | Early adopters |
| 5 | Completely true | 4.5–5.00 | 4.1–5.0 | Innovators |
Source(s): Author’s self-elaborations; Alston and Miller (2002), Mohammad, Noor'Ayni, and Kamal (2014), Owusu-Manu, Torku, Parn, Addy, and Edwards (2017)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.