Table 9 Contrast of the structural model... | Emerald Publishing

Table 9

Contrast of the structural model (path coefficients)

Hypotheses	β	t-value	p-value	Explained variance (%)	Confidence intervals			Supported
Hypotheses	β	t-value	p-value	Explained variance (%)	2.5%	97.5%		Supported
Trust R² = 0.467
H1: e-WOM → Trust	0.299	7.426	0.000***	13.48	0.2189		0.3758	Yes
H2: Web quality → Trust	0.435	9.511	0.000***	26.36	0.3462		0.5260	Yes
H3: Perceived risk → Trust	−0.155	3.470	0.000***	6.60	−0.2424		−0.0665	Yes
Use Intention R² = 0.498
H4: Performance expectancy → Use intention	0.559	11.660	0.000***	38.34	0.4625		0.6505	Yes
H5: Trust → Use intention	0.215	4.400	0.001***	11.71	0.1187		0.3117	Yes

Hypotheses	β	t-value	p-value	Explained variance (%)	Confidence intervals			Supported
Hypotheses	β	t-value	p-value	Explained variance (%)	2.5%	97.5%		Supported
Trust R² = 0.467
H1: e-WOM → Trust	0.299	7.426	0.000***	13.48	0.2189		0.3758	Yes
H2: Web quality → Trust	0.435	9.511	0.000***	26.36	0.3462		0.5260	Yes
H3: Perceived risk → Trust	−0.155	3.470	0.000***	6.60	−0.2424		−0.0665	Yes
Use Intention R² = 0.498
H4: Performance expectancy → Use intention	0.559	11.660	0.000***	38.34	0.4625		0.6505	Yes
H5: Trust → Use intention	0.215	4.400	0.001***	11.71	0.1187		0.3117	Yes

Note(s): ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, ns: not significant (based on t (10.000), two-tailed test)

Source(s): Authors' own creation