Table 4. Fornell–Larcker criterion... | Emerald Publishing

Table 4.

Fornell–Larcker criterion

Variable	AI adoption	Accounting profit	Behavioral intention	Communication structure	Competitive pressure	Organizational culture	Perceived ease of use	Perceived usefulness	Regulatory support	Resources
AI adoption	0.75
Accounting profit	0.74	0.86
Behavioral intention	0.481	0.43	0.81
Communication structure	0.26	0.32	0.21	0.89
Competitive pressure	0.58	0.65	0.30	0.40	0.79
Organizational culture	0.65	0.69	0.36	0.33	0.71	0.89
Perceived ease of use	0.76	0.99	0.42	0.32	0.66	0.70	0.86
Perceived usefulness	0.42	0.43	0.24	0.08	0.22	0.24	0.43	0.89
Regulatory support	0.44	0.36	0.24	0.17	0.38	0.36	0.4	0.26	0.78
Resources	0.62	0.67	0.31	0.34	0.66	0.65	0.69	0.29	0.50	0.88

Variable	AI adoption	Accounting profit	Behavioral intention	Communication structure	Competitive pressure	Organizational culture	Perceived ease of use	Perceived usefulness	Regulatory support	Resources
AI adoption	0.75
Accounting profit	0.74	0.86
Behavioral intention	0.481	0.43	0.81
Communication structure	0.26	0.32	0.21	0.89
Competitive pressure	0.58	0.65	0.30	0.40	0.79
Organizational culture	0.65	0.69	0.36	0.33	0.71	0.89
Perceived ease of use	0.76	0.99	0.42	0.32	0.66	0.70	0.86
Perceived usefulness	0.42	0.43	0.24	0.08	0.22	0.24	0.43	0.89
Regulatory support	0.44	0.36	0.24	0.17	0.38	0.36	0.4	0.26	0.78
Resources	0.62	0.67	0.31	0.34	0.66	0.65	0.69	0.29	0.50	0.88

Source: Table by authors