Table 3

Fit indices for the univariate and bivariate latent change score models

ModelMLRχ2 (df)SCFCFIRMSEASRMRModel comparisonΔMLRχ2 (Δdf)pΔCFI
Career engagement
M1: Intercept only136.93 (6)2.100.590.180.24M1 vs M2119.71 (3)<0.0010.29
M2: Constant change40.715 (3)2.720.880.130.07M1 vs M3138.18 (2)<0.0010.27
M3: Proportional change47.983 (4)2.550.860.130.24M2 vs M432.07 (2)<0.0010.11
M4: Dual change4.09 (1)1.680.990.070.09M3 vs M440.67 (3)<0.0010.13
Perceived employability
M1: Intercept only152.38 (6)1.990.690.190.27M1 vs M270.80 (3)<0.0010.15
M2: Constant change80.76 (3)2.160.840.190.08M1 vs M3128.93 (2)<0.0010.17
M3: Proportional change68.58 (4)2.470.860.150.26M2 vs M471.47 (2)<0.0010.15
M4: Dual change7.99 (1)2.060.990.100.10M3 vs M458.67 (3)<0.0010.13
Bivariate model
M1: No coupling35.52 (6)1.840.980.080.08M1 vs M28.03 (2)0.020.00
M2: CE → ΔPE27.64 (4)1.820.980.090.06M1 vs M325.76 (2)<0.0010.02
M3: PE → ΔCE9.45 (4)1.831.000.040.06M2 vs M425.37 (2)<0.0010.02
M4: Full coupling2.292 (4)1.821.000.010.02M3 vs M47.13 (2)0.030.00

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options