Robustness tests: tobit regression analysis on the relationship between BGD and the time to IPO
| Time to IPO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
| BLAU_INDEX(a) | 1.056** | 1.086** | 2.101*** | |
| (0.387) | (0.391) | (0.477) | ||
| FAM_OWN_DISP(b) | 0.0261 | 0.0238 | ||
| (0.0527) | (0.0507) | |||
| INTERACTION(a*b) | −0.930*** | |||
| (0.269) | ||||
| Costant | 3.563** | 3.393** | 3.474** | 3.539** |
| (1.118) | (1.093) | (1.104) | (1.062) | |
| Pseudo R-squared | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Prob > Chi | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| VIF | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.47 |
| SHANNON_INDEX(a) | 1.257* | 1.288* | 2.656*** | |
| (0.518) | (0.523) | (0.640) | ||
| FAM_OWN_DISP(b) | 0.022 | 2.656 | ||
| (0.053) | (0.050) | |||
| INTERACTION(a*b) | −1.236** | |||
| (0.359) | ||||
| Costant | 3.563** | 3.390** | 3.460* | 3.593*** |
| (1.118) | (1.110) | (1.464) | (1.069) | |
| Pseudo R-squared | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Prob > Chi | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| VIF | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.47 |
| WOM_BOARD_P(a) | 1.513** | 1.561** | 2.852*** | |
| (0.482) | (0.488) | (0.606) | ||
| FAM_OWN_DISP(b) | 0.031 | 0.020 | ||
| (0.052) | (0.050) | |||
| INTERACTION(a*b) | −1.187*** | |||
| (0.352) | ||||
| Costant | 3.563** | 3.424** | 3.523** | 3.505*** |
| (1.118) | (1.083) | (1.095) | (1.055) | |
| R-squared | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Prob > F | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| VIF | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.47 |
| Time to IPO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
| 1.056** | 1.086** | 2.101*** | ||
| (0.387) | (0.391) | (0.477) | ||
| FAM_OWN_DISP( | 0.0261 | 0.0238 | ||
| (0.0527) | (0.0507) | |||
| INTERACTION( | −0.930*** | |||
| (0.269) | ||||
| Costant | 3.563** | 3.393** | 3.474** | 3.539** |
| (1.118) | (1.093) | (1.104) | (1.062) | |
| Pseudo | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Prob > Chi | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| VIF | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.47 |
| (0.518) | (0.523) | (0.640) | ||
| FAM_OWN_DISP( | 0.022 | 2.656 | ||
| (0.053) | (0.050) | |||
| INTERACTION( | ||||
| (0.359) | ||||
| Costant | ||||
| (1.118) | (1.110) | (1.464) | (1.069) | |
| Pseudo | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Prob > Chi | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| VIF | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.47 |
| (0.482) | (0.488) | (0.606) | ||
| FAM_OWN_DISP( | 0.031 | 0.020 | ||
| (0.052) | (0.050) | |||
| INTERACTION( | ||||
| (0.352) | ||||
| Costant | ||||
| (1.118) | (1.083) | (1.095) | (1.055) | |
| 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | |
| Prob > F | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| VIF | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.47 |
Note(s): Robust standard errors in parentheses: ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, †p < 0.1
We only reported results regarding our main predictions (i.e. Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2). While the model was computed with all the control variables as presented in the Methodology section, due to space limitations, the estimations regarding control variables were voluntarily omitted from the table
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.