Table 2 Comparison of the strength and...

Table 2

Comparison of the strength and fit index for the proposed and alternative models

Model types	Proposed model	Alternative model 1	Alternative model 2	Alternative model 3	Alternative model 4
Comparison of the fit index for the proposed and alternative models
Chi-square	638.598	638.598	638.598	638.598	638.598
RMSEA	0.116	0.116	0.116	0.162	0.113
SRMR	0.068	0.068	0.068	0.21	0.068
CFI	0.931	0.931	0.931	0.862	0.932
TLI	0.911	0.911	0.911	0.827	0.915
Chi-square differences		0	0	0	0
RMSEA differences		0	0	0.142	0
SRMR differences		0	0	0.046	0.003
CFI differences		0	0	0.069	0.001
TLI differences		0	0	0.084	0.004
Comparison of the strength of hypothesised relationships for the models
Hypothesized relationships
COV_BIMips_BIMdrf	0.5241237379162876	–	0.5241237379375935	–	0.5242075247793176
COV_BIMcon_BIMint	0.036895952161118774	0.036895952159788956	–	0.036419053991476005	–
BIMips → BIMcon	0.4400513347184923	0.44005133475554514	0.41490330854248264	0.3253892834946819	0.44787600725403276
BIMips → BIMint	0.6662413445153959	0.6662413444908333	0.666241344655145	0.6462578674683186	0.6761196046975729
BIMdrf → BIMcon	−0.14786748999078436	−0.14786749003974142	−0.14974793870534409	0.030997289916253928	−0.15618309377033765
BIMdrf → BIMint	0.04981833934416631	0.04981833937623939	0.04981833914966087	0.12943747088821322	0.03897045836914026
BIMips → BIMdrf	–	0.7189421591348508	–	–	–
BIMint → BIMcon	–	–	0.0377461203364422	–	–

Model types	Proposed model	Alternative model 1	Alternative model 2	Alternative model 3	Alternative model 4
Comparison of the fit index for the proposed and alternative models
Chi-square	638.598	638.598	638.598	638.598	638.598
RMSEA	0.116	0.116	0.116	0.162	0.113
SRMR	0.068	0.068	0.068	0.21	0.068
CFI	0.931	0.931	0.931	0.862	0.932
TLI	0.911	0.911	0.911	0.827	0.915
Chi-square differences		0	0	0	0
RMSEA differences		0	0	0.142	0
SRMR differences		0	0	0.046	0.003
CFI differences		0	0	0.069	0.001
TLI differences		0	0	0.084	0.004
Comparison of the strength of hypothesised relationships for the models
Hypothesized relationships
COV_BIMips_BIMdrf	0.5241237379162876	–	0.5241237379375935	–	0.5242075247793176
COV_BIMcon_BIMint	0.036895952161118774	0.036895952159788956	–	0.036419053991476005	–
BIMips → BIMcon	0.4400513347184923	0.44005133475554514	0.41490330854248264	0.3253892834946819	0.44787600725403276
BIMips → BIMint	0.6662413445153959	0.6662413444908333	0.666241344655145	0.6462578674683186	0.6761196046975729
BIMdrf → BIMcon	−0.14786748999078436	−0.14786749003974142	−0.14974793870534409	0.030997289916253928	−0.15618309377033765
BIMdrf → BIMint	0.04981833934416631	0.04981833937623939	0.04981833914966087	0.12943747088821322	0.03897045836914026
BIMips → BIMdrf	–	0.7189421591348508	–	–	–
BIMint → BIMcon	–	–	0.0377461203364422	–	–

Source(s): Table by authors