Table 7

Bayesian linear regression model comparison of overreaction and underreaction to ESG News

Model comparison - I engage in investments that are SR
ModelsP(M)P(M|data)BFMBF10R2
recentevents + activeduringextremeweatherevents0.0330.33914.9031.0000.362
recentevents + negativereactiontonegativeESGnews + activeduringextremeweatherevents0.0500.1553.4810.3040.368
quickreactiontomktinfo + recentevents + negativereactiontonegativeESGnews + activeduringextremeweatherevents0.2000.1430.6660.0700.368
Activeduringextremeweatherevents0.0500.1112.3650.2170.315
quickreactiontomktinfo + recentevents + activeduringextremeweatherevents0.0500.1012.1280.1980.362
recentevents + negativereactiontonegativeESGnews0.0330.0501.5150.1460.335
negativereactiontonegativeESGnews + activeduringextremeweatherevents0.0330.0300.9050.0890.328
quickreactiontomktinfo + activeduringextremeweatherevents0.0330.0250.7520.0740.325
quickreactiontomktinfo + negativereactiontonegativeESGnews0.0500.0170.3300.0330.336

Note(s): BFM (Bayesian Factor Model) quantifies the evidence favoring one model over another. P(M) is the probability of a specific model. P(M|data) is the probability of the model given the observed data. BF10 is the Bayes Factor supporting the alternative hypothesis over the null hypothesis. R2 represents the coefficient of determination, indicating the proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the independent variables

recentevents: Impact of recent events in the stock market on investment decisions

activeduringextremeweatherevents: Level of activity on sustainability issues during

extreme weather events or climate changes negativereactiontonegativeESGnews: Reacting negatively to negative Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) related news about a specific company

quickreactiontomktinfo: Quick reaction to new information in the market

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options