Table 6

Summary of GLM Mediation models tested

Independent variableDependent variableTotal effectp value95% ICIndirect effect (95% IC)
Professional field: IV1a Computer scienceDVa = Lecture0.01110.922−0.211; 0.233 
DVb = Situated learning−0.26230.031−0.500; −0.024Face-to-face: −0.1525, p = 0.05 (−0.305; 0.001)
DVc = Autonomous learning−0.02020.877−0.277; 0.089 
DVd = Active learning−0.05290.590−0.245; 0.139 
Professional field: IV1b HealthDVa = Lecture0.29070.0130.061; 0.521Face-to-face: 0.1472, p = 0.007 (0.034; 0.255)
DVb = Situated learning0.31890.0110.072; 0.566Face-to-face: 0.1719, p = 0.032 (0.014; 0.329)
Remotely: −0.0681, p = 0.013 (−0.122; −0.014)
DVc = Autonomous learning0.42000.0020.153; 0.687Face-to-face: 0.263; p < 0.001 (0.121; 0.404)
DVd = Active learning0.19100.062−0.009; 0.392 
Internship: IV2a DualDVa = Lecture−0.04890.494−0.026; 0.125 
DVb = Situated learning0.21560.069−0.017; 0.448 
DVc = Autonomous learning0.02830.825−0.222; 0.279 
DVd = Active learning0.12620.196−0.065; 0.317 
Internship: IV2b FCTDVa = Lecture0.13570.171−0.059; 0.329 
DVb = Situated learning−0.02920.781−0.235; 0.177 
DVc = Autonomous learning0.21250.058−0.007; 0.432 
DVd = Active learning0.11490.179−0.053; 0.283 

Source(s): Authors' own data

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options