Table 1.

Data extraction summary of the included studies on healthcare workers – adherence to the MDP among workers: a systematic review

First author, et al. (year)CountryStudy typeSampleType of workersA priori method usedAdherence to the MDP
Health professionals
Petimar et al. (2018) United StatesCohort1,24,707 adults (37.4% males; range: 40–75 years among males and range: 30–55 years among females)Healthcare professionals (Nurses’ Health Studyand Health Professionals Follow-up Study)Alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: from 0 to 9]
Males
Q1: m ± SD = 1.5  ±  0.6, n = 8,726
Q5: m ± SD = 7.4  ±  0.6, n = 6,818
Females
Q1: m ± SD = 1.5  ±  0.6, n = 18,592
Q5: m ± SD = 6.6  ±  0.7, n = 16,213
Wang et al. (2018) United StatesCohort14,046 adults (37.1% males; range: 40–75 years among males, and range: 30–55 years among females)Healthcare professionals (Nurses’ Health Studyand Health Professionals Follow-up Study)Alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: from 0 to 9]
Males
T1: m ± SD = 5.2  ±  1.8, n = 1,842
T2: m ± SD = 4.3  ±  1.9, n = 1,599
T3: m ± SD = 3.4  ±  1.7, n = 1,777
Females
T1: m ± SD = 5.1  ±  1.6, n = 3,189
T2: m ± SD = 4.2  ±  1.8, n = 2,308
T3: m ± SD = 3.2  ±  1.7, n = 3,331
Sotos-Prieto et al.(2015a)United StatesCohort79 538 adults (36.9% males; range: 40–75 years among males, and range: 30–55 years among females)Healthcare professionals (Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study)Alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: from 0 to 9]
Males
Q1: m ± SD = 5.6  ±  1.6, n = 5,945
Q3: m ± SD = 4.2  ±  1.9, n = 7,074
Q5: m ± SD = 3.0  ±  1.6, n = 5,176
Females
Q1: m ± SD = 5.4  ±  1.5, n = 9,576
Q3: m ± SD = 4.0  ±  1.8, n = 11,673
Q5: m ± SD = 2.7  ±  1.6, n = 9,742
Barbhaiya et al. (2021) United StatesCohort1,73,122 female adults (range: 25–55 years)Healthcare professionals (Nurses’ Health Studyand Nurses’ Health StudyII)Alternative Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: from 0 to 9]
Nurses’ Health Study (n = 79,568)
T1: n = 18,930
T2: n = 30,801
T3: n = 29,837
Nurses’ Health Study II (n = 93,554)
T1: n = 37,128
T2: n = 17,638
T3: n = 38,788
Hu et al. (2015) United StatesCohort1,74,638 female adults (range: 25–55 years)Healthcare professionals (Nurses’ Health Studyand Nurses’ Health StudyII)Alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: from 0 to 9]
Nurses’ Health Study (n = 83,245)
Q1: range = 0–2, n = 19,140
Q2: range = 3, n = 17,279
Q3: range = 4–5, n = 32,501
Q4: range = 6–9, n = 14,325
Nurses’ Health Study II (n = 91,393)
Q1: range = 1–2, n = 19,071
Q2: range = 3–4, n = 33,881
Q3: range = 5, n = 16,375
Q4: range = 6–9, n = 22,066
Hirko et al. (2016) United StatesCohort1,00,643 female adults (range: 30–55 years)Healthcare professionals (Nurses’ Health Study)Alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: from 0 to 9]
Q1: range = 0.0–2.6
Q2: range = 2.7–3.5
Q3: range = 3.6–4.4
Q4: range = 4.5–5.4
Q5: range = 5.5–9.0
Jung et al. (2016) United StatesCohort (but with a nested case-control analysis)1,688 female adults (range: 30–55 years)Healthcare professionals (Nurses’ Health Study)Alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: no information]
Q1: median = 20, n= 366
Q2: median = 23, n = 327
Q3: median = 26, n = 381
Q4: median = 28, n = 381
Q5: median = 32, n = 566
Wirth et al. (2018) United StatesCohort43,635 male adults (range: 40–75 years)Healthcare professionals (Health Professionals Follow-up Study)Alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED) score
[range: from 0 to 9]
Q1: range = 0.0–2.0
Q2: range = 3.0–3.0
Q3: range = 4.0–5.0
Q4: range = 5.0–6.0
Q5: range = 6.0–9.0
Kenfield et al. (2014) United StatesCohort (but with a case-only survival analysis)51,529 male adults (range: 40–75 years)Healthcare professionals (Health Professionals Follow-up Study)Mediterranean dietscore (MDS)
[range: from 0 to 9]
At baseline (in 1986)
Low adherence (0–3 points): 36.8%
Moderate adherence (4–5 points): 34.0%
High adherence (6–9 points): 29.2%
Béjar Prado and Mesa Rodríguez (2022) SpainCross-sectional44 adults (47.7% males; mean age of 47.7  ±  11.8 years)Healthcare professionals from hospital emergency services2 indicators: (1) Global adherence indicator, expresses the average of items within the recommendations, ranging from 0 to 15; and (2) Global adherence indicator ≥ 8, expresses the percentage of participants who comply with recommendations in eight or more items(1) Global adherence indicator: m ± SD = 6.0  ±  2.2
(2) Global adherence indicator ≥ 8 points: n = 9 (20.5%)
Rapisarda et al. (2021) ItalyCohort38 adults (45% males; mean age of 48.5  ±  7.4 years among males, and mean age of 49.3  ±  7.9 years among females)Healthcare workers at an emergency hospitalPREDIMED questionnaire
[range: from 0 to 14]
At baseline
Males: m ± SD = 4.6  ±  2.3
Females: m ± SD = 4.8  ±  1.9
González-Sosa et al. (2021) SpainCross-sectional922 adults (28% males; mean age of 42.6  ±  11.4 years; range: 20–69 years)Healthcare personnelMediterranean diet adherence score (MEDAS)
[range: from 0 to 14]
Low adherence (0–8 points): n = 358 (38.8%)
Good adherence (9–14 points): n = 564 (61.2%)
Leyva-Vela et al. (2021) SpainCross-sectional240 female adults (mean age of 37  ±  10 years)Nurses and nursing assistantsPREDIMED-PLUS questionnaire
[range: from 0 to 17]
Overall: m ± SD = 7.2  ±  2.6
Carlos et al. (2020) SpainCohort890 adults (51.9% males; mean age of 51.7  ±  9.4 years; range: 19–65 years)DoctorsMediterranean diet score (MDS)
[range: from 0 to 9]
Low adherence (0–2 points): n = 126 (14.2%)
Moderate adherence (3–5 points): n = 504 (56.6%)
High adherence (6–9 points): n = 260 (29.2%)
Sentenach-Carbo et al. (2019) SpainCross-sectional422 adults (no sample characterization)Primary care physiciansPREDIMED questionnaire
[range: from 0 to 14]
Very low adherence (0–5 points): 12%
Low adherence (6–7 points): 33%
Medium adherence (8–11 points): 52%
High adherence (12–14 points): 3%
Eleuteri et al. (2018) ItalyCross-sectional117 adults (37.6% males; mean age of 54.0  ±  6.4; range: 40–64 years)Primary caregivers of people with Alzheimer’sdisease or dementiaMediterranean diet score (MDS)
[range: from 0 to 55]
Overall: m ± SD = 31.7  ±  5.2
Tountas et al. (2007) GreeceCross-sectional262 adults (38.5%; mean age of 38.3 years)Hospital employees, namely administrative, auxiliary and technical personnel, medical doctors and nursesDiet score
[range: no information]
Males: m ± SD = 34.7  ±  4.0
Females: m ± SD = 34.1  ±  3.8

Notes:

MDP = Mediterranean dietary pattern; m = mean score; SD = standard deviation; n = absolute frequency

Source: Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options