Table 1

Estimation outcomes of the EKC hypothesis with one and two-step SYS-GMM

RegressorsOne-step SYS-GMMTwo-step SYS-GMM
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
CO2t-10.9326*** (0.0525)0.9486*** (0.0440)0.9306*** (0.0527)0.9311*** (0.0541)0.9024*** (0.0636)0.9294*** (0.0520)0.8978*** (0.0658)0.9055*** (0.0622)
Y1.3924 (0.9737)2.4218*** (0.8628)1.1916 (1.0671)1.5027* (0.8299)1.7643** (0.8455)2.3226*** (0.6219)1.5732* (0.9654)1.8072*** (0.6711)
Y2−0.0804 (0.0626)−0.1430*** (0.0528)−0.068 (0.0681)−0.0832 (0.0540)−0.1031* (0.0562)−0.1384*** (0.0377)−0.0909 0.0638−0.1035** (0.0447)
REC−0.0022 (0.0025)−0.0022 (0.0024)−0.0020 (0.0022)−0.0030 (0.0028)−0.0023 (0.0025)−0.0022 (0.0024)−0.0022 (0.0021)−0.0029 (0.0027)
FDI0.0069 (0.0047)0.0073 (0.0046)0.0070 (0.0048)0.0076 (0.0047)0.0078** (0.0038)0.0069* (0.0037)0.0081** (0.0040)0.0077* (0.0040)
EIA 0.0051* (0.0032)   0.0039 (0.0029)  
EII  0.0034 (0.0062)   0.0030 (0.0063) 
EIS   −0.0068* (0.0042)   −0.0051 (0.0037)
TDYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
F (18, 114)2432.142674.182698.752372.371328.921333.181345.621095.32
Prob > F0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
AR(1)0.00300.00200.0030.0020.00300.00300.0040.003
AR(2)0.84900.86500.8460.8520.85900.87200.8540.86
Hansen0.11900.15300.1130.1510.11900.15300.1130.151
Obs1,6101,6101,6101,6101,6101,6101,6101,610
Instrument2628272926282729

Note(s): Robust standard errors are in parenthesis

Source(s): Author's calculation

Instruments and Lags: We used (Y, REC, FDI); (Y, REC, FDI, EIA); (Y, REC, FDI, EII) and (Y, REC, FDI, EIA, EII, EIS) as instruments with lags 2 to 3 in the estimated model (1–4) and (5–8) respectively

Asterisks (***, ** and *) denotes the significance level at 1%, 5 and 10% respectively

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal