Table 1 Details of the included articles...

Table 1

Details of the included articles

No.	Authors*	Country of origin	Journal	Type of article	Article Theme	AI or ChatGPT used in creating any aspect of the manuscript	ChatGPT is listed as an author	AI or ChatGPT mentioned in the acknowledgment
1	Alkaissi and McFarlane	USA	Cureus	Editorial	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
2	Altmäe et al	Spain, Sweden, Estonia	Reproductive Biomedicine Online	Countercurrent	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	N
3	Arman Shafiee	Iran	International Journal of Surgery	Correspondence	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
4	Athaluri et al	India, Ukraine	Cureus	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing mainly its ability to provide correct references)	Y	N	N
5	Babl and Babl	Australia	Emergency Medicine Australasia	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate conference abstracts)	Y	N	N
6	Buholayka et al	USA, KSA	Cureus	Technical report	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
7	Dave et al	Ukraine, India	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence	Review	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	N	N	NA
8	Doyal et al	USA	Cureus	Editorial	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
9	Dunn et al	USA	Journal of American Academy of Dermatology	Research letter	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract), and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	Y	N	N
10	Gandhi and Gandhi	India	Critical Care	Correspondence	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
11	Gao et al	USA	npj Digital Medicine	Brief communication	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract), and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	Y	N	N
12	Geoffrey M. Currie	Australia	Seminars in Nuclear Medicine	Review	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
13	Giglio and Costa	Brazil	Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira	Original research (bibliometric analysis)	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to support the scientific writing, and manage references)	Y	N	Y
14	Gilat and Cole	USA, Israel	Arthroscopy	Letter to the editor	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
15	Huang and Tan	USA, Taiwan	American Journal of Cancer Research	Review	General discussion (including an example of ChatGPT generated text)	Y	N	Y
16	Jan Homolak	Croatia	Croatian Medical Journal	Commentary	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract), and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	N	N	NA
17	John T. Daugirdas	USA	American Journal of Kidney Diseases	Editorial	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
18	Khalif et al	Palestine, Malysia	JMIR Medical Education	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate full research article)	Y	N	Y
19	Lee et al	Malaysia	Malaysian Family Physician	Commentary	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages, and ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
20	Levin et al	Canada, USA, Israel	Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics	Original research (bibliometric analysis)	Evaluating trends of ChatGPT-related publications	N	N	NA
21	Macdonald et al	UK	Journal of Global Health	Editorial	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate full research articles)	Y	N	Y
22	Májovský et al	Czech Republic	Journal of Medical Internet Research	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate full research article) and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	Y	N	Y
23	Malik Sallam	Jordan	Healthcare (Basel)	Review	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
24	Manuela Marescotti	UK	Brain Communications	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
25	Mavrogenis and Scarlat	Greece, France	International Orthopaedics	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
26	Misra and Chandwar	India	Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh	Editorial	General discussion (including recommendations for authors, editors and peer reviewers)	N	N	NA
27	Ocampo et al	Brazil	Imaging Science in Dentistry	Editorial	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
28	Omar Abuyaman	Jordan	JMIR Formative Research	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract)	Y	N	N
29	Pal et al	India, Bangladesh	International Journal of Surgery	Correspondence	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
30	Rozencwajg and Kantora	France	Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine	Editorial	General discussion (including recommendations for authors, editors and peer reviewers)	Y	N	N
31	Salvagno et al	Belgium, Italy	Critical Care	Perspective	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
32	Shunsuke Koga	USA	Korean Journal Of Radiology	Letter to the Editor	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
33	ŠVAB et al	USA	Slovenian Journal of Public Health	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
34	Temsah et al	KSA, UAE, Malaysia	Cureus	Review	Evaluating trends of ChatGPT-related publications	Y	N	Y
35	Tzeng-Ji Chen	Taiwan	Journal of the Chinese Medical Association	Editorial	General discussion (including the role of ChatGPT in translation)	Y	N	N
36	Verhoeven et al	France	British Medical Journal	Editorial	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns) and Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	N
37	Wohlfarth et al	Switzerland	Cureus	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives)	Y	N	N
38	Wu and Dang	Taiwan, USA	American Journal of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to support the scientific writing and manage references)	Y	N	N
39	Xia and Wang	UK, USA	Biomaterials international	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
40	Yasin and AL-Hamad	Qatar, Canada	Research in Nursing and Health	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives)	N	N	NA
41	Zheng and Zhan	USA	The American Journal of Medicine	Commentary	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns) and testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	N

No.	Authors*	Country of origin	Journal	Type of article	Article Theme	AI or ChatGPT used in creating any aspect of the manuscript	ChatGPT is listed as an author	AI or ChatGPT mentioned in the acknowledgment
1	Alkaissi and McFarlane	USA	Cureus	Editorial	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
2	Altmäe et al	Spain, Sweden, Estonia	Reproductive Biomedicine Online	Countercurrent	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	N
3	Arman Shafiee	Iran	International Journal of Surgery	Correspondence	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
4	Athaluri et al	India, Ukraine	Cureus	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing mainly its ability to provide correct references)	Y	N	N
5	Babl and Babl	Australia	Emergency Medicine Australasia	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate conference abstracts)	Y	N	N
6	Buholayka et al	USA, KSA	Cureus	Technical report	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
7	Dave et al	Ukraine, India	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence	Review	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	N	N	NA
8	Doyal et al	USA	Cureus	Editorial	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
9	Dunn et al	USA	Journal of American Academy of Dermatology	Research letter	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract), and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	Y	N	N
10	Gandhi and Gandhi	India	Critical Care	Correspondence	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
11	Gao et al	USA	npj Digital Medicine	Brief communication	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract), and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	Y	N	N
12	Geoffrey M. Currie	Australia	Seminars in Nuclear Medicine	Review	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
13	Giglio and Costa	Brazil	Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira	Original research (bibliometric analysis)	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to support the scientific writing, and manage references)	Y	N	Y
14	Gilat and Cole	USA, Israel	Arthroscopy	Letter to the editor	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
15	Huang and Tan	USA, Taiwan	American Journal of Cancer Research	Review	General discussion (including an example of ChatGPT generated text)	Y	N	Y
16	Jan Homolak	Croatia	Croatian Medical Journal	Commentary	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract), and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	N	N	NA
17	John T. Daugirdas	USA	American Journal of Kidney Diseases	Editorial	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	Y
18	Khalif et al	Palestine, Malysia	JMIR Medical Education	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate full research article)	Y	N	Y
19	Lee et al	Malaysia	Malaysian Family Physician	Commentary	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages, and ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
20	Levin et al	Canada, USA, Israel	Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics	Original research (bibliometric analysis)	Evaluating trends of ChatGPT-related publications	N	N	NA
21	Macdonald et al	UK	Journal of Global Health	Editorial	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate full research articles)	Y	N	Y
22	Májovský et al	Czech Republic	Journal of Medical Internet Research	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate full research article) and testing the ability of AI output detection tools	Y	N	Y
23	Malik Sallam	Jordan	Healthcare (Basel)	Review	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
24	Manuela Marescotti	UK	Brain Communications	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
25	Mavrogenis and Scarlat	Greece, France	International Orthopaedics	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
26	Misra and Chandwar	India	Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh	Editorial	General discussion (including recommendations for authors, editors and peer reviewers)	N	N	NA
27	Ocampo et al	Brazil	Imaging Science in Dentistry	Editorial	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
28	Omar Abuyaman	Jordan	JMIR Formative Research	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to generate abstract)	Y	N	N
29	Pal et al	India, Bangladesh	International Journal of Surgery	Correspondence	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	N	N	NA
30	Rozencwajg and Kantora	France	Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine	Editorial	General discussion (including recommendations for authors, editors and peer reviewers)	Y	N	N
31	Salvagno et al	Belgium, Italy	Critical Care	Perspective	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
32	Shunsuke Koga	USA	Korean Journal Of Radiology	Letter to the Editor	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns)	Y	N	Y
33	ŠVAB et al	USA	Slovenian Journal of Public Health	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
34	Temsah et al	KSA, UAE, Malaysia	Cureus	Review	Evaluating trends of ChatGPT-related publications	Y	N	Y
35	Tzeng-Ji Chen	Taiwan	Journal of the Chinese Medical Association	Editorial	General discussion (including the role of ChatGPT in translation)	Y	N	N
36	Verhoeven et al	France	British Medical Journal	Editorial	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns) and Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	N
37	Wohlfarth et al	Switzerland	Cureus	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives)	Y	N	N
38	Wu and Dang	Taiwan, USA	American Journal of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery	Original research	Testing ChatGPT writing capabilities (testing its ability to support the scientific writing and manage references)	Y	N	N
39	Xia and Wang	UK, USA	Biomaterials international	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages and disadvantages)	Y	N	Y
40	Yasin and AL-Hamad	Qatar, Canada	Research in Nursing and Health	Editorial	General discussion (including advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives)	N	N	NA
41	Zheng and Zhan	USA	The American Journal of Medicine	Commentary	General discussion (handling some ethical concerns) and testing ChatGPT writing capabilities	Y	N	N

Note(s): *Articles are ordered according to the authors’ alphabetical order

N: no, Y: yes, NA: not applicable

Source(s): Table by authors

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable