Suitability and fitness of frameworks to assess system level and local initiatives
| Frameworks | Integrated health and social care specific | Australian-led (local) framework available meeting assessment needs | Suitability characteristics and factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| The innovative policy supports for integrated health and social care programs framework | Yes | No |
|
| Consolidated framework for implementation research | No | No |
|
| Framework on the emergence and effectiveness of global health networks | No | No |
|
| Frameworks | Integrated health and social care specific | Australian-led (local) framework available meeting assessment needs | Suitability characteristics and factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| The innovative policy supports for integrated health and social care programs framework | Yes | No | Flexible structure and use of components Allows for measuring levels of integration Focused on measures tangible innovations and or changes in policies at service level (specific) International usability |
| Consolidated framework for implementation research | No | No | Flexible structure and use of components Focused on measuring system level implementation of agendas (multiple initiatives in different systems) Focused on assessing wider approaches beyond evaluation of specific user outcomes International usability |
| Framework on the emergence and effectiveness of global health networks | No | No | Purpose driven nature Can be used to assess the emergence of the network Can be used to assess the quality and the effectiveness of the network International usability |
Source(s): Wodchis et al. (2020), Damschroder et al. (2009) and Shiffman et al. (2016)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.