Table 3. Comparison of improvement... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3.

Comparison of improvement results

Model	Resolution ratio	ACC	MACC	IOU			MIOU	FPS
Model	Resolution ratio	ACC	MACC	Traffic sign	Road	Pole	MIOU	FPS
SegNext	512 × 512	88.77	73.02	65.56	75.47	39.91	62.85	13
	640 × 640	89.95	79.69	69.55	76.34	50.96	70.19	4
	1,080 × 1,080	89.84	79.67	69.45	76.31	50.39	69.85	2
Proposed model	512 × 512	93.22	88.2	74.29	78.79	60.64	68.38	6
	640 × 640	92.86	87.69	77.19	82.94	65.35	78.23	2
	1,080 × 1,080	92.86	87.69	73.19	76.96	63.27	70.27	1

Model	Resolution ratio	ACC	MACC	IOU			MIOU	FPS
Model	Resolution ratio	ACC	MACC	Traffic sign	Road	Pole	MIOU	FPS
SegNext	512 × 512	88.77	73.02	65.56	75.47	39.91	62.85	13
	640 × 640	89.95	79.69	69.55	76.34	50.96	70.19	4
	1,080 × 1,080	89.84	79.67	69.45	76.31	50.39	69.85	2
Proposed model	512 × 512	93.22	88.2	74.29	78.79	60.64	68.38	6
	640 × 640	92.86	87.69	77.19	82.94	65.35	78.23	2
	1,080 × 1,080	92.86	87.69	73.19	76.96	63.27	70.27	1

Note:

Better performance is shown in red

Source: Table created by authors