Table 3 Regression models Model 1 Model... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Regression models

	Model 1	Model 2
	Adjustment measurements
Akaike Information Criteria (AIC)	AIC = 568.28	AIC = 571,12
Degree of dependent variable explanation (Firm Performance) (R2)	R2 = 0.135	R2 = 0.140
Model’s parameters (dependent variable – Firm Performance)

	Model 1	Model 2
	Adjustment measurements
Akaike Information Criteria (AIC)	AIC = 568.28	AIC = 571,12
Degree of dependent variable explanation (Firm Performance) (R2)	R2 = 0.135	R2 = 0.140
Model’s parameters (dependent variable – Firm Performance)

Predictor	Coefficient	Range of confidence	p-value	Coefficient	Range of confidence	p-value
Absolute term	Mar.22	2.12–4.33	0.00	Apr.57	1.06–8.09	<0.01
Small enterprises	0.27	−0.09–0.64	0.14	0.27	−0.1–0,63	0.15
(from 10 to 49 employees)	0.27	−0.09–0.64	0.14	0.27	−0.1–0,63	0.15
Medium enterprises	0.55	−0.01–1.11	0.06	0.53	−0.04–1.1	0.07
(from 50 to 249 employees)	0.55	−0.01–1.11	0.06	0.53	−0.04–1.1	0.07
Learning orientation (LO)	0.38	0.14–0.61	0.00	0.02	−0.79–0.83	0.96
Market Dynamism (MD)	–	–	–	−0.34	−1.24–0.56	0.45
Moderation effects (moderator: Market Dynamism)
LO:MD*	–	–	–	0.09	−0.12–0.3	0.39

Predictor	Coefficient	Range of confidence	p-value	Coefficient	Range of confidence	p-value
Absolute term	Mar.22	2.12–4.33	0.00	Apr.57	1.06–8.09	<0.01
Small enterprises	0.27	−0.09–0.64	0.14	0.27	−0.1–0,63	0.15
(from 10 to 49 employees)	0.27	−0.09–0.64	0.14	0.27	−0.1–0,63	0.15
Medium enterprises	0.55	−0.01–1.11	0.06	0.53	−0.04–1.1	0.07
(from 50 to 249 employees)	0.55	−0.01–1.11	0.06	0.53	−0.04–1.1	0.07
Learning orientation (LO)	0.38	0.14–0.61	0.00	0.02	−0.79–0.83	0.96
Market Dynamism (MD)	–	–	–	−0.34	−1.24–0.56	0.45
Moderation effects (moderator: Market Dynamism)
LO:MD*	–	–	–	0.09	−0.12–0.3	0.39

Note(s): *colon sign between LO and MD means the interaction between the factors (learning orientation, market dynamism) included in the H2 hypothesis

Source(s): Own elaboration