Table 2

The results of the intergroup analysis of variance due to some characteristics of respondents*

Dependent variableTest value and probability
M1M7M8M11M9eM13j
1a F(1, 371) = 4.01, p = 0.05F(2, 381) = 4.61, p = 0.01F(4, 382) = 3.25, p = 0.01  
1b  F(2, 380) = 4.86, p = 0,01 F(1, 381) = 5.85, p = 0.02 
1c    F(1, 381) = 3.97, p = 0.05F(1, 380) = 6.47, p = 0.01
1dF(1, 383) = 3.89, p = 0.05F(1, 371) = 4.88, p = 0.03  F(1, 382) = 4.66, p = 0.03 
1e    F(1, 380) = 6.70, p = 0.01F(1, 380) = 9.19, p = 0.00
1f  F(2, 379) = 3.01, p = 0.05   
1g   F(4, 381) = 7.11, p < 0.00F(1, 381) = 5.81, p = 0.02 
1hF(1, 382) = 4.79, p = 0.03    F(1, 381) = 5.22, p = 0.02
1i    F(1, 380) = 11.24, p < 0.00 

Note(s): *We included only significant differences between group averages

1a – goodwill, 1b – skills, 1c – moral integrity, 1d – loyalty, 1e – competence, 1f – reputation, 1g – openness, 1h – fulfillment of the promise, 1i – willingness to meet requirements

M1 – gender, M7 – who decides on food purchases, M8 – the main place to buy food, M11 – self-assessment of the level of trust, M9e – labels as the main source of food safety information, M13j – self-assessment of customer type: determined

Source(s): Own elaboration

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal