Results of one-way ANOVA analysis of variance on statements related to FPCs’ attitudes toward food safety*
| Respondents’ characteristics | Test value and probability | |
|---|---|---|
| FPCs should be especially sensitive to food safety | Honesty and ethics should characterize every FPC | |
| Gender | F(1,383) = 7.81, p = 0.05 | |
| Socio-economic group | F(5, 378) = 2.77, p = 0.02 | F(5, 378) = 2.62, p = 0.02 |
| The overall level of confidence | F(4, 382) = 2.58, p = 0.04 | |
| The overall attitude toward risk | F(4, 381) = 2.76, p = 0.03 | F(4, 381) = 2.44, p = 0.05 |
| School/University – the main source of food safety information | F(1, 382) = 4.49, p = 0.04 | |
| Customer type – familiar | F(1, 382) = 5.70, p = 0.02 | |
| Customer type – skeptical | F(1, 382) = 4.46, p = 0.04 | |
| Respondents’ characteristics | Test value and probability | |
|---|---|---|
| FPCs should be especially sensitive to food safety | Honesty and ethics should characterize every FPC | |
| Gender | F(1,383) = 7.81, | |
| Socio-economic group | F(5, 378) = 2.77, | F(5, 378) = 2.62, |
| The overall level of confidence | F(4, 382) = 2.58, | |
| The overall attitude toward risk | F(4, 381) = 2.76, | F(4, 381) = 2.44, |
| School/University – the main source of food safety information | F(1, 382) = 4.49, | |
| Customer type – familiar | F(1, 382) = 5.70, | |
| Customer type – skeptical | F(1, 382) = 4.46, | |
Note(s): * Only significant differences between group averages are included
Source(s): Own elaboration
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.