Table 4

Hierarchical regression analysis results

Hypotheses testingPost hoc analysis
Dependent variable: export venture performanceDependent variable: export function performance
Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6
Independent variables
Intelligence activity 0.31 (4.69)**0.30 (4.47)** 0.16 (2.40)**0.13 (2.09)*
Responsiveness activity 0.01 (0.17)0.07 (1.11) 0.24 (3.57)**0.27 (4.12)**
Moderator variables
Partner selection through WOM referral 0.07 (1.17)0.04 (0.65) 0.09 (1.49)0.08 (1.33)
Interaction terms
Intelligence activity × WOM referral  −0.15 (−2.27)*  −0.00 (−0.04)
Responsiveness activity × WOM referral  0.21 (3.13)**  0.21 (3.11)**
Control variables
Firm size (log)0.11 (1.62)0.12 (1.90)0.13 (2.03)*0.15 (2.23)*0.13 (2.10)*0.14 (2.27)*
Export experience (log)−0.05 (−0.64)−0.05 (−0.75)−0.04 (−0.59)0.12 (1.58)0.11 (1.59)0.12 (1.74)
Export scope (log)0.13 (1.76)0.07 (1.01)0.08 (1.11)0.08 (1.07)0.01 (0.12)0.00 (0.05)
Environmental dynamism0.07 (1.01)0.06 (0.89)0.10 (1.46)−0.04 (−0.52)−0.05 (−0.78)−0.03 (−0.40)
Environmental diversity−0.12 (−1.64)−0.14 (−1.98)*−0.17 (−2.44)**0.08 (1.13)0.07 (1.04)0.05 (0.80)
Psychic distance−0.02 (−0.26)−0.00 (−0.01)0.01 (0.17)−0.05 (0.78)0.01 (0.03)−0.01 (−0.11)
R20.040.140.180.070.190.23
Adjusted-R20.020.110.140.050.160.19
F-statistics1.734.434.733.056.116.31

Note(s): All reported betas are standardized (t-values in parentheses). Critical t-values are 1.960 and 2.326 for significance levels of 2.5% and 1% respectively (because all hypotheses are directional, we used one-tailed tests). **p < 0.01, *p < 0.025

Source(s): Author’s own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal