Table 9

Diff-in-diff baseline results: effect of contractual agreements with banks on FinTechs' website traffic (Model 2b) for different time intervals

Time intervals−4 to 0−4 to 1−4 to 2−4 to 3−4 to 4
Panel A – Dependent variable: G_Trends
Post*Bank_Partner0.0540.1250.2280.2100.232
(0.099)(0.124)(0.175)(0.149)(0.155)
Post*Age−0.034−0.051−0.062−0.063−0.065
(0.036)(0.037)(0.041)(0.041)(0.041)
Firm fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
Year fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
N° observations367447502534558
R20.0110.0240.0360.0280.025
F-stat1.1383.596**6.348***5.294***5.144***
Treated pre-treatment average (*): 11.671
Control pre-treatment average (*): 4.080
Panel B – Dependent variable: G_Trends_Growth
Post*Bank_Partner−0.0040.0150.0620.0310.038
(0.027)(0.042)(0.075)(0.091)(0.123)
Post*Age−0.011−0.018−0.023−0.023−0.024
(0.010)(0.012)(0.015)(0.014)(0.015)
Firm fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
Year fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
N° observations367447502534558
R20.0070.0230.0260.0060.004
F-stat0.9542.788*4.589**1.0480.819
Treated pre-treatment average (*): 2.974
Control pre-treatment average (*): 1.888

Note(s): The coefficient of the interaction Post*Bank_Partner3) measures the effect of contractual agreements with banks on the website traffic of treated FinTech firms compared to control units and can only be estimated when considering also post-treatment periods. All the specifications include firm fixed effects, time fixed effects and the interaction Post*Age. The columns show the results of separate panel regressions for each time interval, with the dummy Post equal to 1 in the years when we want to evaluate the effect of strategic alliances with banks and 0 in pre-treatment period (−4 to −1). Standard errors are clustered at firm level. Significance levels: *, **, *** for 10%, 5% and 1% respectively

(*) Pre-treatment average of the dependent variable for treated and control FinTech firms

Source(s): Table was created by the authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options