Table 18

Diff-in-diff robustness check: effect of contractual agreements with banks on FinTechs' website traffic (Model 2b) for the time window (−1, 4)

Time intervals−1 to 0−1 to 1−1 to 2−1 to 3−1 to 4
Panel A – Dependent variable: G_Trends
Post*Bank_Partner0.0040.0590.1430.1350.164
(0.113)(0.101)(0.109)(0.114)(0.120)
Post*Age−0.036−0.044**−0.050**−0.048**−0.050**
(0.024)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)(0.022)
Firm fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
Year fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
N° observations207287342374398
R20.0350.0310.0290.0180.015
F-stat1.7482.809*3.401**2.331*2.104
Panel B – Dependent variable: G_Trends_Growth
Post*Bank_Partner−0.038−0.0310.004−0.018−0.005
(0.028)(0.035)(0.046)(0.068)(0.089)
Post * Age−0.013***−0.017***−0.018***−0.014*−0.012
(0.005)(0.006)(0.006)(0.008)(0.009)
Firm fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
Year fixed effectsYesYesYesYesYes
N° observations207287342374398
R20.0860.0340.0180.0020.001
F-stat4.564**3.109**2.1180.2290.117

Note(s): The coefficient of the interaction Post*Bank_Partner3) measures the effect of contractual agreements with banks on the website traffic of treated FinTech firms compared to control units and can only be estimated when considering also post-treatment periods. All the specifications include firm fixed effects, time fixed effects and the interaction Post*Age. The columns show the results of separate panel regressions for each time interval, with the dummy Post equal to 1 in the years when we want to evaluate the effect of strategic alliances with banks and 0 in pre-treatment period (−1). Standard errors are clustered at firm level. Significance levels: *, **, *** for 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively

Source(s): Table was created by the authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options