Diff-in-diff robustness check: effect of contractual agreements with banks on FinTechs' website traffic (Model 2b) for the time window (−1, 4)
| Time intervals | −1 to 0 | −1 to 1 | −1 to 2 | −1 to 3 | −1 to 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panel A – Dependent variable: G_Trends | |||||
| Post*Bank_Partner | 0.004 | 0.059 | 0.143 | 0.135 | 0.164 |
| (0.113) | (0.101) | (0.109) | (0.114) | (0.120) | |
| Post*Age | −0.036 | −0.044** | −0.050** | −0.048** | −0.050** |
| (0.024) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.022) | |
| Firm fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N° observations | 207 | 287 | 342 | 374 | 398 |
| R2 | 0.035 | 0.031 | 0.029 | 0.018 | 0.015 |
| F-stat | 1.748 | 2.809* | 3.401** | 2.331* | 2.104 |
| Panel B – Dependent variable: G_Trends_Growth | |||||
| Post*Bank_Partner | −0.038 | −0.031 | 0.004 | −0.018 | −0.005 |
| (0.028) | (0.035) | (0.046) | (0.068) | (0.089) | |
| Post * Age | −0.013*** | −0.017*** | −0.018*** | −0.014* | −0.012 |
| (0.005) | (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.008) | (0.009) | |
| Firm fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N° observations | 207 | 287 | 342 | 374 | 398 |
| R2 | 0.086 | 0.034 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| F-stat | 4.564** | 3.109** | 2.118 | 0.229 | 0.117 |
| Time intervals | −1 to 0 | −1 to 1 | −1 to 2 | −1 to 3 | −1 to 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post*Bank_Partner | 0.004 | 0.059 | 0.143 | 0.135 | 0.164 |
| (0.113) | (0.101) | (0.109) | (0.114) | (0.120) | |
| Post*Age | −0.036 | −0.044** | −0.050** | −0.048** | −0.050** |
| (0.024) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.022) | |
| Firm fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N° observations | 207 | 287 | 342 | 374 | 398 |
| R2 | 0.035 | 0.031 | 0.029 | 0.018 | 0.015 |
| F-stat | 1.748 | 2.809* | 3.401** | 2.331* | 2.104 |
| Post*Bank_Partner | −0.038 | −0.031 | 0.004 | −0.018 | −0.005 |
| (0.028) | (0.035) | (0.046) | (0.068) | (0.089) | |
| Post * Age | −0.013*** | −0.017*** | −0.018*** | −0.014* | −0.012 |
| (0.005) | (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.008) | (0.009) | |
| Firm fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N° observations | 207 | 287 | 342 | 374 | 398 |
| R2 | 0.086 | 0.034 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| F-stat | 4.564** | 3.109** | 2.118 | 0.229 | 0.117 |
Note(s): The coefficient of the interaction Post*Bank_Partner (β3) measures the effect of contractual agreements with banks on the website traffic of treated FinTech firms compared to control units and can only be estimated when considering also post-treatment periods. All the specifications include firm fixed effects, time fixed effects and the interaction Post*Age. The columns show the results of separate panel regressions for each time interval, with the dummy Post equal to 1 in the years when we want to evaluate the effect of strategic alliances with banks and 0 in pre-treatment period (−1). Standard errors are clustered at firm level. Significance levels: *, **, *** for 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively
Source(s): Table was created by the authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.