Table 2 Fit indices for the compared...

Table 2

Fit indices for the compared latent pattern job crafting models

Model	Log-Lh	FP	AIC	BIC	ABIC	Entropy	LMR	Group sizes
One pattern	−1,628.405	8	3,272.810	3,305.843	3,280.453			459
Two patterns	−1,528.628	13	3,083.255	3,136.933	3,095.675	0.627	0.000	254,205
Three patterns	−1,491.737	18	3,019.474	3,093.797	3,036.670	0.722	0.187	290,115,54
Four patterns	−1,471.392	23	2,988.785	3,083.753	3,010.758	0.823	0.002	16,234,113,96
Five patterns	−1,461.556	28	2,979.113	3,094.726	3,005.862	0.797	0.284	16,236,109,39,59
Six patterns	−1,451.639	33	2,969.277	3,105.536	3,000.804	0.745	0.062	137,115,97,16,39,55
Seven patterns	−1,444.552	38	2,965.104	3,122.008	3,001.407	0.785	0.702	5,127,135,72,96,8,16

Model	Log-Lh	FP	AIC	BIC	ABIC	Entropy	LMR	Group sizes
One pattern	−1,628.405	8	3,272.810	3,305.843	3,280.453			459
Two patterns	−1,528.628	13	3,083.255	3,136.933	3,095.675	0.627	0.000	254,205
Three patterns	−1,491.737	18	3,019.474	3,093.797	3,036.670	0.722	0.187	290,115,54
Four patterns	−1,471.392	23	2,988.785	3,083.753	3,010.758	0.823	0.002	16,234,113,96
Five patterns	−1,461.556	28	2,979.113	3,094.726	3,005.862	0.797	0.284	16,236,109,39,59
Six patterns	−1,451.639	33	2,969.277	3,105.536	3,000.804	0.745	0.062	137,115,97,16,39,55
Seven patterns	−1,444.552	38	2,965.104	3,122.008	3,001.407	0.785	0.702	5,127,135,72,96,8,16

Note(s): Log-LH, log-likelihood; FP, Free Parameters; AIC, Akaike Information Criteria; BIC, Bayes Information Criteria; ABIC, Adjusted Bayes Information Criteria; LMR, Lo-Mendell-Rubin

Source(s): Authors’ work

[ViewLarge]