Regression analysis result
| Model 1 control variables only | Model 2 (direct 1) | Model 3 (direct 2) | Model 4 (direct 3) | Model 5 (all direct effects) | Model 6 (direct and indirect effects) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 control variables | ||||||
| Gender | −0.051 | −0.074 | −0.040 | 0.169** | −0.081 | −0.088 |
| Age group | −0.096 | 0.095 | −0.081 | −0.058 | 0.062 | 0.071 |
| Marital status | 0.039 | −0.045 | −0.022 | 0.059 | −0.045 | −0.053 |
| Employment status | −0.086 | −0.047 | −0.101 | −0.088 | −0.066 | −0.038 |
| Monthly income | ||||||
| Type of family | ||||||
| Step 2: first independent variable | ||||||
| Social well-being | 0.633*** | |||||
| Step 3: second independent variable | ||||||
| Physical well-being | 0.451*** | |||||
| Step 4: third independent variable | ||||||
| Psychological well-being – Eudaimonic | 0.413*** | |||||
| Step 5: fourth independent variable | ||||||
| Psychological well-being – hedonic | ||||||
| Step 6: all direct effects | ||||||
| Social well- being | 0.048*** | 0.348** | ||||
| Physical well- being | 0.219*** | 0.111 | ||||
| Psychological well-being Eudaimonic | 0.142** | 0.025 | ||||
| Psychological well-being – hedonic | ||||||
| Model R | 0.159 | 0.627*** | 0.474*** | 0.430*** | 0.664*** | 0.670*** |
| Model R2 | 0.025 | 0.393*** | 0.224*** | 0.185*** | 0.441*** | 0.449*** |
| Change in R2 | 0.368 | −0.169 | −0.039 | 0.256 | 0.008 | |
| Model F | 1.521 | 30.129*** | 13.479*** | 10.581*** | 26.038*** | 23.445*** |
| Durbin–Watson | 1.938 | 1.900 | 1.871 | 1.643 | 1.880 | 1.913 |
| Model 1 control variables only | Model 2 (direct 1) | Model 3 (direct 2) | Model 4 (direct 3) | Model 5 (all direct effects) | Model 6 (direct and indirect effects) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | −0.051 | −0.074 | −0.040 | 0.169** | −0.081 | −0.088 |
| Age group | −0.096 | 0.095 | −0.081 | −0.058 | 0.062 | 0.071 |
| Marital status | 0.039 | −0.045 | −0.022 | 0.059 | −0.045 | −0.053 |
| Employment status | −0.086 | −0.047 | −0.101 | −0.088 | −0.066 | −0.038 |
| Monthly income | ||||||
| Type of family | ||||||
| Social well-being | 0.633*** | |||||
| Physical well-being | 0.451*** | |||||
| Psychological well-being – Eudaimonic | 0.413*** | |||||
| Psychological well-being – hedonic | ||||||
| Social well- being | 0.048*** | 0.348** | ||||
| Physical well- being | 0.219*** | 0.111 | ||||
| Psychological well-being Eudaimonic | 0.142** | 0.025 | ||||
| Psychological well-being – hedonic | ||||||
| Model | 0.159 | 0.627*** | 0.474*** | 0.430*** | 0.664*** | 0.670*** |
| Model | 0.025 | 0.393*** | 0.224*** | 0.185*** | 0.441*** | 0.449*** |
| Change in | 0.368 | −0.169 | −0.039 | 0.256 | 0.008 | |
| Model | 1.521 | 30.129*** | 13.479*** | 10.581*** | 26.038*** | 23.445*** |
| Durbin–Watson | 1.938 | 1.900 | 1.871 | 1.643 | 1.880 | 1.913 |
Note(s): n = 421; standardised regression coefficients are reported
*p < 0.10; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.