Table 1

List of participants

IdAgeGenderCalling domainLCH/WeekGWP typeWork besides GWPs
Pilot phase
I154MCoaching6.02HGig work
I234FHandyman7.020LDGig work
I327MHandyman16LDGig work
I434FWeb design45LIGig work
I541FText writing5.025LIGig work
I627MText writing6.030LIGig work
Screened sample
I741MCrypto currency consulting4.215LDGig work
I840MFuneral services6.520LDGig work
I934MDog training5.320LDGig work
I1027MIT consultancy4.215LDGig work
I1133FCooking5.825LDEmployed
I1254MHandyman4.73LDGig work
I1334MEngineering4.215LDOLP only
I1450FHealth therapy5.815HGig work
I1521MProofreading3.020LIEmployed
I1631MDJing, music production4.515LIGig work
I1744MMarketing communication6.28LIGig work
I1830MCustomer administration4.81LIOLP only
I1923MVideo creation4.30.5LIGig work
I2031MWeb developer5.31LIGig work
I2133MVoice artist5.36LIEmployed
I2233MBusiness development5.37.5LIGig work
I2337MData science4.72LIGig work
I2443MLegal consultancy5.32LIEmployed and gig work
I2528MGraphic design5.214LIGig work
I2629FContent creation4.510LIEmployed
I2718MOnline marketing4.310LIEmployed
I2837FCooking4.830LIOLP only
I2923FContent creation6.23LIOLP only
I3048FContent creation5.315LIGig work
I3135FTutoring4.310LIOLP only
I3228FVisual design4.71LIEmployed
I3331FVideo creation4.015LIGig work
I3430MFinancial consulting6.24LIGig work

Note(s): LC = score of the living a calling scale; h = hybrid (location dependent and independent); LD = location dependent; LI = location independent; the six participants of the pilot study received the screening survey a few weeks after the interview and four out of the six participants responded; only participants with a score above 4 on the living a calling scale were included in the sample; one participant was included despite scoring lower than four on the living a calling scale, as he made explicit statements about being able to live a calling

Source(s): Authors’ work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal