SMEs’ feedback on Prototype 2.0
| Aspect | Feedback | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| First impressions | Positive | Curiosity and interest expressed towards interactive features. A single negative comment observed |
| Navigational aspects | Majority ratings: 8; 25% at 9; 25% at 10 | Overall positive perception. User-friendliness approved |
| User-friendliness | 70% - rating: 4; 15% - rating: 5 | High approval rate for user-friendliness |
| New features | All ratings above 3 | Positive responses for Pomodoro timer and games |
| Preferences | Liking for fresh aesthetic; need for hands-on interaction | Positive reception; desire for more hands-on experience |
| Specific features | Appreciation for user-friendliness, enhanced interactivity, improved navigation | Positive feedback for new features; some dislikes expressed |
| Graphics and UI/UX expertise | Positive reactions | Clean graphics, colourful design and in-house expertise acknowledged |
| Irritations | Lack of discernible irritations; one SME suggested improvement in managing technical jargon | Minor irritations reported; room for clarity improvement |
| Aspect | Feedback | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| First impressions | Positive | Curiosity and interest expressed towards interactive features. A single negative comment observed |
| Navigational aspects | Majority ratings: 8; 25% at 9; 25% at 10 | Overall positive perception. User-friendliness approved |
| User-friendliness | 70% - rating: 4; 15% - rating: 5 | High approval rate for user-friendliness |
| New features | All ratings above 3 | Positive responses for Pomodoro timer and games |
| Preferences | Liking for fresh aesthetic; need for hands-on interaction | Positive reception; desire for more hands-on experience |
| Specific features | Appreciation for user-friendliness, enhanced interactivity, improved navigation | Positive feedback for new features; some dislikes expressed |
| Graphics and UI/UX expertise | Positive reactions | Clean graphics, colourful design and in-house expertise acknowledged |
| Irritations | Lack of discernible irritations; one SME suggested improvement in managing technical jargon | Minor irritations reported; room for clarity improvement |
Source(s): Author's work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.