Pilot course feedback by actual students
| Aspect | Feedback |
|---|---|
| Initial impressions | Generally positive with two negative comments, one of which was irrelevant to the layout |
| Navigational experiences | Varied ratings, with five students rating 5 and above, and two rating below 5. Ease of navigation received mixed ratings, with six students rating 3 and above and one rating 1 |
| Overall experience | Mixed ratings, with four students rating 3 and above, and three rating below 3. Diverse responses regarding template traits, with positive feedback on design and layout, mixed ratings for interactivity and generally positive feedback on colour |
| Positive aspects | Highlighted aspects include announcements, segmented groups, design, colouring and layout |
| Concerns | Centred around quiz errors, misplaced content, difficulty in downloading materials and issues with understanding layout formats |
| Unexpected positive mentions | Experience with new interface and interactivity mentioned positively |
| Relevant concerns raised | Losing marks, format of notes in PDFs, difficulties in understanding the discussion layout, deemed irrelevant to the template as they applied to course content |
| Student suggestions | Limited, with some expressing uncertainty and others preferring a return to PDF files |
| Overall response | Generally positive response to FlexLearn 2.0 template, with specific areas for improvement noted in content organization and download functionalities |
| Aspect | Feedback |
|---|---|
| Initial impressions | Generally positive with two negative comments, one of which was irrelevant to the layout |
| Navigational experiences | Varied ratings, with five students rating 5 and above, and two rating below 5. Ease of navigation received mixed ratings, with six students rating 3 and above and one rating 1 |
| Overall experience | Mixed ratings, with four students rating 3 and above, and three rating below 3. Diverse responses regarding template traits, with positive feedback on design and layout, mixed ratings for interactivity and generally positive feedback on colour |
| Positive aspects | Highlighted aspects include announcements, segmented groups, design, colouring and layout |
| Concerns | Centred around quiz errors, misplaced content, difficulty in downloading materials and issues with understanding layout formats |
| Unexpected positive mentions | Experience with new interface and interactivity mentioned positively |
| Relevant concerns raised | Losing marks, format of notes in PDFs, difficulties in understanding the discussion layout, deemed irrelevant to the template as they applied to course content |
| Student suggestions | Limited, with some expressing uncertainty and others preferring a return to PDF files |
| Overall response | Generally positive response to FlexLearn 2.0 template, with specific areas for improvement noted in content organization and download functionalities |
Source(s): Author's work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.