Taxonomy of disclosure strategies
| Disclosure strategy | Disclosure sub-strategy | Definition | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impression management | is “a field of study within social psychology studying how individuals present themselves to others to be perceived favourably by others” (Hooghiemstra, 2000, p. 60) is an attempt “to control and manipulate the impression conveyed to users of accounting information” (Clatworthy & Jones, 2001, p. 311) is a disclosure that “strategically…manipulates the perceptions and decisions of stakeholders” (Yuthas et al., 2002, p. 142) | ||
| Attribution | is “a defensive framing tactic that shifts the blame for negative outcomes away” (Merkl-Davies & Brennan, 2007, p. 11) is “…a self-serving bias involving individuals' perceptions and explanations of events that manifests itself in a tendency to claim more responsibility for successes than for failures. In a financial reporting context, it entails managers attributing positive organizational outcomes to internal factors (‘entitlements’) and negative organizational outcomes to external factors (‘excuses’)” (Merkl-Davies & Brennan, 2007, p. 12) | Enumeration of external factors that contributed to the catastrophe; enumeration of firms or people that may also be to blame; explaining how the corporation tried to prevent the controversy; assurances that it will do everything to explain its causes | |
| Concealment | can “…be achieved in two ways: by either (1a) obfuscating negative outcomes (bad news) or (1b) emphasizing positive organizational outcomes (‘good news’)” (Merkl-Davies & Brennan, 2007, p. 11) | Highlighting corporation’s efforts to prevent the occurrence of catastrophes or controversies and its achievements and successes in the sustainability disclosure area; avoiding information about the current controversy and related issues | |
| Incremental information | The most useful information for stakeholders including components valued by investors, which determines the preferred level of disaggregation (Jennings, 1990) | ||
| Objective information | Information presented in a way to avoid the impression that its author(s) expresses their stance or personal feelings | A neutral description of a controversy; omitting words implying remorsefulness or an apology such as sorry, terrible, apologize, regret | |
| Apology | The expression of how the author feels about some information | An apologetic description of a controversy expressing guilty consciousness through words such as sorry, terrible, apologise, regret |
| Disclosure strategy | Disclosure sub-strategy | Definition | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impression management | is “a field of study within social psychology studying how individuals present themselves to others to be perceived favourably by others” ( | ||
| Attribution | is “a defensive framing tactic that shifts the blame for negative outcomes away” ( | Enumeration of external factors that contributed to the catastrophe; enumeration of firms or people that may also be to blame; explaining how the corporation tried to prevent the controversy; assurances that it will do everything to explain its causes | |
| Concealment | can “…be achieved in two ways: by either (1a) obfuscating negative outcomes (bad news) or (1b) emphasizing positive organizational outcomes (‘good news’)” ( | Highlighting corporation’s efforts to prevent the occurrence of catastrophes or controversies and its achievements and successes in the sustainability disclosure area; avoiding information about the current controversy and related issues | |
| Incremental information | The most useful information for stakeholders including components valued by investors, which determines the preferred level of disaggregation ( | ||
| Objective information | Information presented in a way to avoid the impression that its author(s) expresses their stance or personal feelings | A neutral description of a controversy; omitting words implying remorsefulness or an apology such as sorry, terrible, apologize, regret | |
| Apology | The expression of how the author feels about some information | An apologetic description of a controversy expressing guilty consciousness through words such as sorry, terrible, apologise, regret |
Source(s): Own elaboration
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.