Table 1. Analysis of the reviewed... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1.

Analysis of the reviewed scientific papers

Paper	Diversity	Objective	Method	Type of space	Outcome
Migliore et al. (2022)	Gender	Show how the workspace influences female workers and gender equality	SLR – systematic literature review (68 papers)	Various office types + home as a workspace + new working spaces	Spaces are often designed for the ideal type of worker: a Caucasian middle-aged man. Scholarly conversations neglect the effects of specific spatial arrangements of the house on women’s work outcomes and relationships with colleagues. Authors call for further research on these new working spaces (e.g. co-working spaces or maker spaces) mainly focus on women’s work outcomes (e.g. productivity), while little is known about the alleged relations between these workspaces and women’s status aspects

Paper	Diversity	Objective	Method	Type of space	Outcome
Migliore et al. (2022)	Gender	Show how the workspace influences female workers and gender equality	SLR – systematic literature review (68 papers)	Various office types + home as a workspace + new working spaces	Spaces are often designed for the ideal type of worker: a Caucasian middle-aged man. Scholarly conversations neglect the effects of specific spatial arrangements of the house on women’s work outcomes and relationships with colleagues. Authors call for further research on these new working spaces (e.g. co-working spaces or maker spaces) mainly focus on women’s work outcomes (e.g. productivity), while little is known about the alleged relations between these workspaces and women’s status aspects

Source: Authors’ own work