Table 9 Comparison of Findings Between... | Emerald Publishing

Table 9

Comparison of Findings Between Methods

Rank	State ranking is	GRA (⁠ $ζ = 0.5)$	CoCoSo	MABAC	MARICA
1–4 10–50	Supported by 4 Methods	Results are similar across all methods. (Rankings match findings in Table 8)
5	Supported by 3 Methods	PA	IN	PA	PA
6	Supported by 3 Methods	IN	PA	IN	IN
7	Supported by 3 Methods	MN	MA	MN	MN
8	Supported by 3 Methods	OH	MN	OH	OH
9	Supported by 3 Methods	MA	OH	MA	MA

Rank	State ranking is	GRA ( $ζ = 0.5)$	CoCoSo	MABAC	MARICA
1–410–50	Supported by 4 Methods	Results are similar across all methods. (Rankings match findings in Table 8)
5	Supported by 3 Methods	PA	IN	PA	PA
6	Supported by 3 Methods	IN	PA	IN	IN
7	Supported by 3 Methods	MN	MA	MN	MN
8	Supported by 3 Methods	OH	MN	OH	OH
9	Supported by 3 Methods	MA	OH	MA	MA

Note(s): 1: most at risk; 50: least at risk

Source(s): Table by authors