Table A1

Focus overview of analyzed articles

Core author(s)ArticleFWCITarget regionAim of the articleSurvey periodSample size
Kliestik, Kovacova (Misankova), ValaskovaKliestik et al. (2017) 28.44SlovakiaTo design and assess a novel tool for bankruptcy prediction2012–2015265,347
Kliestik, KovacovaKovacova and Kliestik (2017) 7.25SlovakiaTo construct models for the bankruptcy prediction of Slovak companies and compare the overall predictive ability of the two developed models20151,000
Kliestik, KovacovaKovacova et al. (2018) 2.25SlovakiaTo test the validity of prediction models developed as partial results of our research project2015–201627,029
Kliestik, Kovacova, ValaskovaValaskova et al. (2018) 26.19SlovakiaTo assess the financial risks of Slovak entities, realized by identifying significant factors and determinants affecting the prosperity of Slovak companies201562,533
Kliestik, Kovacova, Valaskova, VrbkaKliestik et al. (2020) 15.44Slovakia, the Czech
Republic, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Croatia, Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
To analyse and compare financial ratios used in the models of transition countries1993–2018180 models (not companies) were analyzed
Kliestik, VrbkaKliestik et al. (2018) 4.47V4 (Czech Rep., Hungary, Poland, Slovakia)To develop a model to reveal the unhealthy development of the enterprises in V4 countries, which is done by the multiple discriminant analysis2015–2016449,781
Kovacova (Misankova)Gavurova et al. (2017) 3.92SlovakiaAssessment of four bankruptcy prediction models to determine the most appropriate model2009–2014700
Kovacova, ValaskovaKovacova et al. (2019) N/AV4 (Czech Rep., Hungary, Poland, Slovakia)To provide deep insight and analyse the bankruptcy prediction models developed in countries of Visegrad four, emphasizing methods applied and explanatory variables used in these models, and evaluate them through appropriate statistical methodsNot stated103 prediction models developed in V4 countries
Kovacova, VrbkaPodhorska et al. (2020) N/AEmerging markets including 17 countries from EuropeTo create a comprehensive prediction model of enterprise financial distress based on decision trees under emerging market conditions. The model also contains three dummy variables (country, size of enterprise and NACE classification) and countries’ GDP data2015–20162,359,731
ValaskovaValaskova et al. (2020) N/ASlovakiaTo portray the bankruptcy models (eight) developed in conditions of the Slovak republic, especially in the agriculture sector, verify their predictive ability using divergent statistical methods, and explore the importance of financial ratios in the prediction of financial stability2016–20183,329
Altman, LaitinenAltman et al. (2017) 18.0331 European + 3 non-European countries (USA, China, Colombia)To deliberate on categorizing the Z-Score model in terms of forecasting bankruptcy2002–20102,640,778
Altman, LaitinenAltman, Iwanicz-Drozdowska, Laitinen, and Suvas (2016) 1.25FinlandTo evaluate the effectiveness of financial and nonfinancial variables in the long-term perspective2004–201359,099
AltmanBarboza et al. (2017) 14.88North AmericaTo test machine learning models to predict bankruptcy one year before the event, and compare their performance with other models1985–201341,741
AltmanAltman (2018) 2.41Not mentionedTo assess the fundamental and stats elements of Altman’s Z-score model presented in 19681968–2018No real data
AltmanAltman (2018) 2.03Not mentionedTo discuss many implementations of the Z-score1968–2018No real data
Altman, LaitinenAltman et al. (2020) 1.93FinlandTo compare the accuracy and efficiency of five different estimation methods for predicting the financial distress of small and medium-sized enterprises2004–201348,916
LaitinenLaitinen and Lukason (2014) 1.89Finland, EstoniaConsidering “the novel topic of comparing firm failure processes between different countries.”2002–2009140
LaitinenLaitinen and Suvas (2016) 2.07EU–26The objective is to investigate the influence of Hofstede’s original cultural dimensions on financial distress prediction2002–20101,278,362
LaitinenLukason and Laitinen (2019) 1.36EU (Italy, France, Spain, Romania, Hungary)The paper aims to extract firm failure processes (FFPs) by using failure risk and ranking the importance of failure risk contributors for different stages of FFPsN/A1,234
LaitinenMuñoz-Izquierdo et al. (2020) 1.86SpainTo empirically analyse the usefulness of combining accounting and auditing data to predict corporate financial distress. Concretely, to examine whether audit report information incrementally predicts distress over a traditional accounting model: the Altman’s Z-Score model2004–2014808
JabeurJabeur et al. (2021) 8.30FranceTo propose a new gradient boosting technique for bankruptcy prediction, namely, CatBoost2014–2016133
JabeurBen Jabeur (2017) 2.03FranceTo improve the LR in the presence of highly correlated data, by using a PLS-LR that offers a significant alternative by allowing, among other advantages, in considering the action of the existing correlation2006–2008800
JabeurJabeur and Fahmi (2018) 1.82FranceTo present a model to predict financial distress in French companies2006–2008800
JabeurStef and Jabeur (2018) 0.53FranceTo determine if nonfinancial variables such as the number of new firms can represent a useful tool for forecasting a firm’s liquidation2006–2008825
JabeurBen Jabeur, Stef, and Carmona (2022) 4.44FranceAn improved Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm based on feature importance selection (FS-XGBoost) is proposed to predict corporate failure2014–20171,850
TsaiLiang et al. (2016) 6.17TaiwanTo assess the prediction performance obtained by combining multiple financial ratios and corporate governance indicators1999–2009478
TsaiTsai and Cheng (2012) 1.41Australia, Germany, JapanTo examine the performance of bankruptcy prediction models after removing several outlier volumesN/A4,778
TsaiTsai and Hsu (2013) 1.14Australia, Germany, JapanTo present a meta-learning framework to predict bankruptcyN/A2,343
TsaiLiang, Tsai, and Wu (2015) 2.78Australia, Germany, Taiwan, ChinaA comprehensive study examines the effect of performing filter and wrapper-based feature selection methods on financial distress prediction. In addition, the impact of feature selection on the prediction models obtained using various classification techniques is also investigatedN/A2,818
TsaiLiang et al. (2020) 1.65USATo construct a bankruptcy prediction model based on multiple financial ratios and corporate governance indicators1996–2014286
TsaiTsai et al. (2021) 1.41Not exactly specifiedTo compare the performance of three feature selection algorithms, three instance selection algorithms, four classification algorithms, and two ensemble learning techniquesN/A242,429
JonesJones et al. (2017) 6.16USABased on a large sample of US corporate bankruptcies, we examine the predictive performance of 16 classifiers, ranging from the most restrictive classifiers (such as logit, probit and linear discriminant analysis) to more advanced techniques such as neural networks, support vector machines (SVMs) and “new age” statistical learning models including generalized boosting, AdaBoost and random forests2000–N/A3,111
JonesPeat and Jones (2012) N/AAustraliaThe study adds to current debates by investigating the performance of N.N.s in the context of forecast combination. Furthermore, to test the performance of the N.N. model with the most widely used discrete choice model in the bankruptcy literature, logistic regressionPeriod 1: 2000–2002, Period 2: 2003+558 max/period (different samples for different periods)
JonesJones (2017) 3.91USATo outline a conspicuous trend in the literature by applying the gradient boosting model1987–20131,115
JonesCheng, Jones, and Moser (2018) 0.27USATo examine the trading behaviour of U.S. corporate insiders and certain groups of institutional investors (short-term, transient, top-performing, and those with fiduciary responsibility) in the eight quarters leading up to a U.S. firm bankruptcy filing1992–2012610
JonesJones and Wang (2019) 2.16Whole worldThe study utilizes an advanced machine learning method known as TreeNet(R) (Salford Systems, 2017) to predict various private company failure states, ranging from binary settings (i.e. failed vs non-failed) to more complex multi-class settings with up to five states of failure2009–20134,922,271
JonesAlam, Gao, and Jones (2021) 0.97North AmericaTo propose a deep learning model of firm failure prediction and compare it to the traditional prediction model2001–2018641,667
Li, SunSun, Li, Huang, and He (2014) 5.97ChinaTo compile a complete summary, analysis and evaluation of the current literature on financial distress prediction (FDP)N/ANo real data
Li, SunLi and Sun (2009) 2.06ChinaTo construct of hybrid case-based reasoning model and to test the performanceN/A153
Li, SunLi and Sun (2011a) N/AChinaTo explain the data mining technique of two-step clustering; to introduce a new mining methodN/A266
Li, SunLi and Sun (2011b) 1.30ChinaTo explain the necessity to base such case-based reasoning ensemble (CBRE) prediction technique on random similarity functions (RSF)N/A313
Li, SunLi and Sun (2011c) 1.52ChinaTo construct a principal-component case-based reasoning ensemble (PC-CBR-E) modelN/A270
Li, SunLi and Sun (2011d) 0.36ChinaTo compare different models using SVM techniquesN/A153
Li, SunLi, Lee, Zhou, and Sun (2011) 1.17ChinaTo construct a new model based on random subspace binary logistic regression analysisN/A270
Li, SunLi and Sun (2012) 1.01ChinaTo compare the CBR ensemble with MDA, logistic regression, and classical CBR algorithmN/A153
Li, SunLi, Hong, He, Xu, and Sun (2013) 0.40ChinaTo construct a small sample-oriented case-based kernel predictive method (SSOCBKPM)N/A200
Li, SunLi, Li, Wu, and Sun (2014) 2.42ChinaTo verify statistically a performance of statistic-based wrapper based on SVM methodsN/A668
Li, SunSun et al. (2014) 0.97ChinaTo explore the “imbalanced FDP based on SVM.”Sample 1:
2010–2012
Sample 2:
2012–2013
427
Li, SunSun et al. (2016) 0.79China, worldTo propose an approach for dynamic evaluation and prediction of financial distress based on the entropy-based weighting (EBW), the support vector machine (SVM) and an enterprise’s vertical sliding time window (VSTW)2006–20105
Li, SunSun et al. (2019) 0.56ChinaTo replicate the Campbell, Hilscher, and Szilagyi (2008) bankruptcy prediction model and add additional terms for the absolute value of changes in the percentage ownership by corporate insiders over the previous six months or changes in ownership by specific groups of institutional investors2000–2015486
LiLi, Hong, Zhou, and Yu (2015) 0.12ChinaTo compare pure SVM, hybrid SVM, SVM ensemble, and hybrid SVM ensembleN/A551
LiLi, Xu, and Yu (2017) 0.57ChinaTo provide a “feasible approach to handle possible mixed information caused by oversampling; mixed sample modelling (MSM).”N/ANo real data
du Jardindu Jardin (2016) 3.51FranceTo present a new model of bankruptcy prediction based on ensembles of models2002–2012 Learning samples 2002–2011 (one set per year), testing samples 2003–2012 (one set per year)337,400
du Jardindu Jardin and Séverin (2012) 0.82FranceTo introduce a new way of using a Kohonen map as a prediction modelPeriod 1: 1998–2000, period 2: 2000–2002, period 3: 2002–200411,540
du Jardindu Jardin (2018) 1.62FranceTo propose a new bankruptcy prediction model that relies on estimating failure patterns that are quantified with ensembles of Kohonen maps2007–20146,120
du Jardindu Jardin et al. (2019) 1.35FranceTo present a new measure that helps improve bankrupt models’ accuracy by using a method to embody earnings managementPeriod 1: 2006–2007, Period 2: 2009–2010, Period 3: 2011–201214,220 max (different samples for different periods)
du Jardindu Jardin (2021) 1.25FranceTo present a new method of bankruptcy prediction based on modelling firms’ history with a self-organizing map. To propose an approach that relies on a particular modelling of firm history using self-organizing neural networks and segmentation of the data space, which makes it possible to typify subsets of firms that share a common evolution of their financial situation over timePeriod 1: 2000–2003, Period 2: 2004–2007, Period 3: 2007–2011, Period 4: 2011–2015293,840
du Jardindu Jardin (2021) 2.82FranceTo present a new firm-failure forecasting method using an ensemble of self-organizing neural networks2008–2015470,330
KorolKorol (2013) 2.61Poland, Latin America (Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru)To compare “the effectiveness of twelve different early warning models.”Poland 2000–2007, Latin America 1996–2009245
KorolKorol and Kolodi (2011) 1.15PolandTo present a fuzzy logic-based system1999–2005132
KorolKorol (2018) 0.167 EU countries, ten non-EU countriesTo evaluate the effectiveness of the 13 fuzzy logic modelsSample 1: 1999–2007, Sample 2: 2000–2009, Sample 3: 1999–2009166
KorolKorol (2019) N/AEUTo develop and evaluate dynamic bankruptcy prediction models for European enterprises2004–2017, the period ten years before bankruptcy600
Karas, RežňákováKaras and Režňáková (2017) 1.84Czech RepublicTo verify whether bankruptcy predictors are specific in terms of industry or time2004–2013 (the concerned companies went bankrupt 2008–2013)34,533
Karas, RežňákováRežňáková and Karas (2015) 0.97V4 (Czech Rep., Hungary, Poland, Slovakia)To test the predictive capability of the original version of the Altman model in an environment different from the environment of its origin and to explore its transferability to a different economic environment2007–20125,977
Karas, RežňákováKaras et al. (2017) 0.50Czech RepublicTo analyse the current accuracy of four traditional bankruptcy prediction models (the revised Z-score model, Altman-Sabato’s model in both versions – with unlogged and logged predictors, and IN 05 model) in agriculture2011–2014475
Karas, RežňákováKaras and Režňáková (2017) 1.16Czech RepublicTo create a bankruptcy prediction model based on the data from construction companies in the Czech Republic2011–2014654
Karas, RežňákováKaras and Režňáková (2018) 0.53Czech RepublicTo analyze the usefulness of information about the past development of a company’s financial situation in predicting bankruptcy2011–20141,355
KarasKaras and Srbová (2019) 0.52Czech RepublicTo test the current accuracies of five selected bankruptcy models in predicting the bankruptcy of construction companies and to create a new model designed specifically for this branch2006–2015 (the concerned companies went bankrupt 2011–2015)4,420
Karas, RežňákováKaras and Režňáková (2020) 0.41Czech RepublicTo introduce a new hybrid model incorporating solely cashflow-based indicators (three model versions were derived)2013–20184,350
Karas, RežňákováKaras and Režňáková (2021) 1.25EU-28Construct a default prediction model incorporating factors considered internal or external manifestations of the financial constraint situation. For example, authors use the Cox semiparametric model, leaving the baseline hazard rate unspecified and employing macroeconomic variables as explanatory variables2014–2019213,731

Note(s): By core authors within the period 2010–2022; sorted in descending order by the FWCI indicator

Source(s): Appendix created by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal