Table 2 Project performance metrics per...

Table 2

Project performance metrics per EVMS maturity and environment heat map zone

Performance metrics	Red	Orange	Yellow	Green	p-value
Cost growth (in %)	+92.3	+48.1	+13.7	−0.3	0.007*
Cost growth, without change orders (in %)	+45.4	+6.3	+0.2	−4.4	0.093
Schedule growth (in %)	+24.3	+26.9	+3.7	−5.9	0.102
Change absolute value (in %)	56.7	47.2	13.4	7.7	0.454
Final cost performance index (unitless)	0.85	0.95	0.95	1.03	0.091
% of projects compliant with EIA-748-D	20.0%	71.5%	100.0%	100.0%	0.007*
Meeting business objectives (1–5 scale)	2.7	4.3	4.4	5.0	0.003*
Customer satisfaction (1–5 scale)	2.7	4.3	4.4	5.0	0.007*
EVMS helped proactively manage (1–5 scale)	2.7	3.5	3.9	4.0	0.105

Performance metrics	Red	Orange	Yellow	Green	p-value
Cost growth (in %)	+92.3	+48.1	+13.7	−0.3	0.007*
Cost growth, without change orders (in %)	+45.4	+6.3	+0.2	−4.4	0.093
Schedule growth (in %)	+24.3	+26.9	+3.7	−5.9	0.102
Change absolute value (in %)	56.7	47.2	13.4	7.7	0.454
Final cost performance index (unitless)	0.85	0.95	0.95	1.03	0.091
% of projects compliant with EIA-748-D	20.0%	71.5%	100.0%	100.0%	0.007*
Meeting business objectives (1–5 scale)	2.7	4.3	4.4	5.0	0.003*
Customer satisfaction (1–5 scale)	2.7	4.3	4.4	5.0	0.007*
EVMS helped proactively manage (1–5 scale)	2.7	3.5	3.9	4.0	0.105

Note(s): *denotes p-values that are less than 0.05, meaning the observed differences between the heat map zones are statistically significant in this sample based on Kruskal–Wallis tests

Source(s): Tables were created by the authors

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable