Comparison of the effectiveness of two experimental methods
| Early and on time (<= 0 min) | Slightly delayed (0–15 min) | Moderately delayed (15–35 min) | Significantly delayed (>35 min) | Full state | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full data | MAE (min) | 0.3327 | 0.7870 | 1.5134 | \ | 0.5043 |
| RMS (min) | 0.6077 | 1.1471 | 1.9194 | \ | 0.6518 | |
| Samples | 239 | 153 | 12 | \ | 404 | |
| Delay data | MAE (min) | \ | 0.9987 | 1.2093 | \ | 1.0223 |
| RMS (min) | \ | 1.5473 | 1.3149 | \ | 1.5231 | |
| Samples | \ | 95 | 12 | \ | 107 |
| Early and on time (<= 0 min) | Slightly delayed (0–15 min) | Moderately delayed (15–35 min) | Significantly delayed (>35 min) | Full state | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full data | MAE (min) | 0.3327 | 0.7870 | 1.5134 | \ | 0.5043 |
| RMS (min) | 0.6077 | 1.1471 | 1.9194 | \ | 0.6518 | |
| Samples | 239 | 153 | 12 | \ | 404 | |
| Delay data | MAE (min) | \ | 0.9987 | 1.2093 | \ | 1.0223 |
| RMS (min) | \ | 1.5473 | 1.3149 | \ | 1.5231 | |
| Samples | \ | 95 | 12 | \ | 107 |
Source(s): Author's own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.