Results of testing hypotheses
| Hypotheses | VIFs | Std. β | t-value | Bootstrap | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effects | |||||
| H1: Health concern → SFA | 1.54 | 0.23 | 4.64*** | [0.13; 0.32] | Support |
| H2: Environmental concern → SFA | 1.41 | 0.23 | 4.96*** | [0.14; 0.33] | Support |
| H3: CFC-Immediate → SFA | 1.09 | 0.14 | 4.05*** | [0.07; 0.21] | Support |
| H4: CFC-Future → SFA | 1.15 | 0.16 | 4.22*** | [0.09; 0.23] | Support |
| H5a: CFC-Immediate → health concern | 1.00 | 0.21 | 6.89*** | [0.15; 0.27] | Support |
| H5b: CFC-Immediate → environmental concern | 1.00 | 0.06 | 1.59ns | [−0.01; 0.13] | Not support |
| H6a: CFC-Future → health concern | 1.00 | 0.29 | 6.99*** | [0.21; 0.37] | Support |
| H6b: CFC-Future → environmental concern | 1.00 | 0.24 | 6.05*** | [0.16; 0.31] | Support |
| Indirect effects | |||||
| H7a: CFC-Immediate → health concern → SFA | 0.05 | 3.86*** | [0.03; 0.08] | Support | |
| H7b: CFC-Immediate → environmental concern → SFA | 0.01 | 1.52ns | [−0.002; 0.03] | Not support | |
| H8a: CFC-Future → health concern → SFA | 0.07 | 3.93*** | [0.04; 0.10] | Support | |
| H8b: CFC-Future → environmental concern → SFA | 0.06 | 3.54*** | [0.03; 0.09] | Support | |
| Control variables | |||||
| Age → SFA | 1.14 | −0.06 | 1.83ns | [−0.12; 0.003] | – |
| Gender → SFA | 1.04 | 0.16 | 2.36* | [0.03; 0.29] | – |
| Education → SFA | 1.13 | 0.05 | 1.44ns | [−0.02; 0.12] | – |
| Income → SFA | 1.23 | −0.04 | 1.03ns | [−0.11; 0.04] | – |
| R2 (%) | SFA: 26.8 | ||||
| f2 | f2 Health concern → SFA: 0.05; f2 Environmental concern → SFA: 0.05 f2 CFC-Immediate → SFA: 0.02 f2 CFC-Future → SFA: 0.03 f2 CFC-Immediate → Health concern: 0.05 f2 CFC-Future → Health concern: 0.10 f2 CFC- Future → Environmental concern: 0.06 | ||||
| Hypotheses | VIFs | Std. β | Bootstrap | Conclusion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.54 | 0.23 | 4.64*** | [0.13; 0.32] | Support | |
| 1.41 | 0.23 | 4.96*** | [0.14; 0.33] | Support | |
| 1.09 | 0.14 | 4.05*** | [0.07; 0.21] | Support | |
| 1.15 | 0.16 | 4.22*** | [0.09; 0.23] | Support | |
| 1.00 | 0.21 | 6.89*** | [0.15; 0.27] | Support | |
| 1.00 | 0.06 | 1.59ns | [−0.01; 0.13] | Not support | |
| 1.00 | 0.29 | 6.99*** | [0.21; 0.37] | Support | |
| 1.00 | 0.24 | 6.05*** | [0.16; 0.31] | Support | |
| 0.05 | 3.86*** | [0.03; 0.08] | Support | ||
| 0.01 | 1.52ns | [−0.002; 0.03] | Not support | ||
| 0.07 | 3.93*** | [0.04; 0.10] | Support | ||
| 0.06 | 3.54*** | [0.03; 0.09] | Support | ||
| Age → SFA | 1.14 | −0.06 | 1.83ns | [−0.12; 0.003] | – |
| Gender → SFA | 1.04 | 0.16 | 2.36* | [0.03; 0.29] | – |
| Education → SFA | 1.13 | 0.05 | 1.44ns | [−0.02; 0.12] | – |
| Income → SFA | 1.23 | −0.04 | 1.03ns | [−0.11; 0.04] | – |
| SFA: 26.8 | |||||
Note(s): SFA: sustainable food (fish) attitudes; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05; ns non-significant
Source(s): Authors' own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.