Four stakeholder types
| Text passage | Category | Main category |
|---|---|---|
| They believe global warming is not happening, human-caused, or a threat, and most endorse conspiracy theories (e.g. “global warming is a hoax”) | Not believing in global warming | Science Deniers |
| They reject the reality of climate change | Rejecting reality of climate change | |
| Although the majority of people take these robust results of scientific inquiry for granted, science deniers publicly oppose these results | Rejecting scientific results | |
| Finally, several respondents doubted the reliability of climate science (e.g. “unscientific theory”) | Doubting reliability of scientific results | |
| They argued that nobody needed to worry about global warming, for it was all nothing but “junk science” | Denying science | |
| They think human-caused global warming is happening […] but impacts are still distant in time and space and not a serious risk | Doubts about climate impacts | Adaptation Skeptics |
| They are less supportive of government action to reduce climate change | No support for adaptation/mitigation measures | |
| people believe that it is prudent to “wait and see” whether a potential environmental risk will actually cause harm | Doubts about consequences of climate change | |
| They are uncertain about the causes and consequences of climate change means potentially costly actions to address the risks should be deferred | Defer costly adaptation/mitigation actions | |
| When science conflicts with “common sense” people are unlikely to favor or adopt policies consistent with science | No support for science-driven policies | |
| Emerging green market brings many opportunities in different fields | Positive effects of sustainable turn | Whitewashers |
| Properly designed environmental standards can trigger innovations that lower the total cost of a product | Lower production costs for environmental-friendly products | |
| Sustainable development is a far more inclusive guide for happiness when compared with isolated concepts such as income, employment and economic freedom | Sustainable development as guide for happiness | |
| Creating green jobs has come to be seen as a possible solution for creating new jobs, while the green economy has come to be seen as a solution to climate change, environmental degradation and poverty growth | Green jobs and economy as solutions to climate change | |
| […] tendency to communicate only the […] “sunshine perspective” of sustainability —i.e. to tell a story that focuses only on the positive aspects and impacts of sustainability | Focus only on positive side of a sustainable turn | |
| They are convinced global warming is happening, human-caused, an urgent threat and strongly support climate policies | Urgency of anthropogenic climate change | World Saviors |
| They are already highly engaged, seek to motivate activism and eager to know what individual and collective actions they can take to help reduce global warming | Need for action to reduce global warming | |
| They are willing to abstain from longer car or plane journeys. They are willing to give up certain living conveniences to do something about climate change | Accept restricting measures | |
| Individuals that commits crimes of economic sabotage in defense of the environment or to direct changes in environmental policy | Defending the environment at any cost |
| Text passage | Category | Main category |
|---|---|---|
| They believe global warming is not happening, human-caused, or a threat, and most endorse conspiracy theories (e.g. “global warming is a hoax”) | Not believing in global warming | |
| They reject the reality of climate change | Rejecting reality of climate change | |
| Although the majority of people take these robust results of scientific inquiry for granted, science deniers publicly oppose these results | Rejecting scientific results | |
| Finally, several respondents doubted the reliability of climate science (e.g. “unscientific theory”) | Doubting reliability of scientific results | |
| They argued that nobody needed to worry about global warming, for it was all nothing but “junk science” | Denying science | |
| They think human-caused global warming is happening […] but impacts are still distant in time and space and not a serious risk | Doubts about climate impacts | |
| They are less supportive of government action to reduce climate change | No support for adaptation/mitigation measures | |
| people believe that it is prudent to “wait and see” whether a potential environmental risk will actually cause harm | Doubts about consequences of climate change | |
| They are uncertain about the causes and consequences of climate change means potentially costly actions to address the risks should be deferred | Defer costly adaptation/mitigation actions | |
| When science conflicts with “common sense” people are unlikely to favor or adopt policies consistent with science | No support for science-driven policies | |
| Emerging green market brings many opportunities in different fields | Positive effects of sustainable turn | |
| Properly designed environmental standards can trigger innovations that lower the total cost of a product | Lower production costs for environmental-friendly products | |
| Sustainable development is a far more inclusive guide for happiness when compared with isolated concepts such as income, employment and economic freedom | Sustainable development as guide for happiness | |
| Creating green jobs has come to be seen as a possible solution for creating new jobs, while the green economy has come to be seen as a solution to climate change, environmental degradation and poverty growth | Green jobs and economy as solutions to climate change | |
| […] tendency to communicate only the […] “sunshine perspective” of sustainability —i.e. to tell a story that focuses only on the positive aspects and impacts of sustainability | Focus only on positive side of a sustainable turn | |
| They are convinced global warming is happening, human-caused, an urgent threat and strongly support climate policies | Urgency of anthropogenic climate change | |
| They are already highly engaged, seek to motivate activism and eager to know what individual and collective actions they can take to help reduce global warming | Need for action to reduce global warming | |
| They are willing to abstain from longer car or plane journeys. They are willing to give up certain living conveniences to do something about climate change | Accept restricting measures | |
| Individuals that commits crimes of economic sabotage in defense of the environment or to direct changes in environmental policy | Defending the environment at any cost |
Source(s): Authors’ own creation
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.