Table 8. H7 and H8 contingency table... | Emerald Publishing

Table 8.

H7 and H8 contingency table

	When WFH, how much time do you commit to work? (%)
	Less than in an office	No difference	More than usual	Total
2020
Back at the office	15.69	41.18	43.14	100
WFH setup	13.97	34.93	51.09	100
Total	14.29	36.07	49.64	100
2021
Back at the office	13.64	53.03	33.33	100
WFH setup	20.31	35.94	43.75	100
Total	18.6	40.31	41.09	100
2022
Back at the office	30.25	32.72	37.04	100
WFH setup	20.88	34.62	44.51	100
Total	25.29	33.72	40.99	100

	When WFH, how much time do you commit to work? (%)
	Less than in an office	No difference	More than usual	Total
2020
Back at the office	15.69	41.18	43.14	100
WFH setup	13.97	34.93	51.09	100
Total	14.29	36.07	49.64	100
2021
Back at the office	13.64	53.03	33.33	100
WFH setup	20.31	35.94	43.75	100
Total	18.6	40.31	41.09	100
2022
Back at the office	30.25	32.72	37.04	100
WFH setup	20.88	34.62	44.51	100
Total	25.29	33.72	40.99	100

Measures of association among variables
2020	Pearson Chi² (2) =	1.0678	Prob = 0.586	There is no evidence of a significant association among the variables
2021	Pearson Chi² (2) =	5.9688	Prob = 0.051
2022	Pearson Chi² (2) =	4.232	Prob = 0.121
2020	Cramer’s V =	0.06175		V < 0.2 indicates a weak association
2021	Cramer’s V =	0.15292
2022	Cramer’s V =	0.11091
2020	λ =	0.000		Propensity to WFH explains about 0% of the variation on WLB
2021	λ =	0.000
2022	λ =	0.000

Source: Authors’ elaboration