Multivariate analysis of long-run granger causality
| Panel A – VXX, TVIX and XIV ETNs with SPVXSTER | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full sample | 3:45–4:15 p.m. | |||||
| Sign of coefficient | −1 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ln(VXX) → Ln(SPVXSTR) | 11.7 | 75.1 | 22.1 | 17.6 | 63.6 | 27.7 |
| Ln(VXX) → Ln(TVIX) | 13.7 | 42.7 | 52.5 | 27.6 | 38.2 | 43.2 |
| Ln(VXX) → Ln(XIV) | 60.0 | 43.2 | 5.7 | 54.6 | 33.2 | 21.1 |
| Ln(TVIX) → Ln(SPVXSTR) | 16.0 | 78.9 | 14.0 | 23.5 | 65.9 | 19.5 |
| Ln(TVIX) → Ln(VXX) | 12.9 | 57.9 | 38.0 | 17.6 | 63.2 | 28.0 |
| Ln(TVIX) → Ln(XIV) | 25.6 | 53.8 | 29.5 | 26.0 | 63.9 | 19.0 |
| Ln(XIV) → Ln(SPVXSTR) | 17.9 | 76.2 | 14.8 | 34.6 | 49.8 | 24.5 |
| Ln(XIV) → Ln(VXX) | 48.8 | 54.1 | 6.0 | 48.2 | 46.0 | 14.7 |
| Ln(XIV) → Ln(TVIX) | 30.8 | 47.3 | 30.8 | 32.0 | 49.8 | 27.2 |
| Ln(SPVXSTR) → Ln(VXX) | 11.8 | 73.1 | 23.9 | 23.1 | 25.0 | 60.9 |
| Ln(SPVXSTR) → Ln(TVIX) | 22.5 | 65.9 | 20.5 | 45.6 | 24.4 | 38.9 |
| Ln(SPVXSTR) → Ln(XIV) | 19.2 | 69.6 | 20.4 | 47.6 | 24.0 | 37.5 |
| Elasticity Full Sample: TVIX = 0.087, VXX = 0.57 and XIV = −0.22 3:45–4:15 p.m.: TVIX = 0.03, VXX = 0.17 and XIV = −0.32 | ||||||
| Panel A – VXX, TVIX and XIV ETNs with SPVXSTER | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full sample | 3:45–4:15 p.m. | |||||
| Sign of coefficient | −1 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ln(VXX) → Ln(SPVXSTR) | 11.7 | 75.1 | 22.1 | 17.6 | 63.6 | 27.7 |
| Ln(VXX) → Ln(TVIX) | 13.7 | 42.7 | 52.5 | 27.6 | 38.2 | 43.2 |
| Ln(VXX) → Ln(XIV) | 60.0 | 43.2 | 5.7 | 54.6 | 33.2 | 21.1 |
| Ln(TVIX) → Ln(SPVXSTR) | 16.0 | 78.9 | 14.0 | 23.5 | 65.9 | 19.5 |
| Ln(TVIX) → Ln(VXX) | 12.9 | 57.9 | 38.0 | 17.6 | 63.2 | 28.0 |
| Ln(TVIX) → Ln(XIV) | 25.6 | 53.8 | 29.5 | 26.0 | 63.9 | 19.0 |
| Ln(XIV) → Ln(SPVXSTR) | 17.9 | 76.2 | 14.8 | 34.6 | 49.8 | 24.5 |
| Ln(XIV) → Ln(VXX) | 48.8 | 54.1 | 6.0 | 48.2 | 46.0 | 14.7 |
| Ln(XIV) → Ln(TVIX) | 30.8 | 47.3 | 30.8 | 32.0 | 49.8 | 27.2 |
| Ln(SPVXSTR) → Ln(VXX) | 11.8 | 73.1 | 23.9 | 23.1 | 25.0 | 60.9 |
| Ln(SPVXSTR) → Ln(TVIX) | 22.5 | 65.9 | 20.5 | 45.6 | 24.4 | 38.9 |
| Ln(SPVXSTR) → Ln(XIV) | 19.2 | 69.6 | 20.4 | 47.6 | 24.0 | 37.5 |
| Elasticity | ||||||
| Panel B – VIXY, UVXY and SVXY ETFs with SPVXSTER | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Full sample | 3:45–4:15 p.m. | ||||
| Sign of coefficient | −1 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| ln(SVXY) → ln(SPVXSTER) | 24.7 | 50.9 | 24.4 | 30.8 | 46.2 | 23.0 |
| ln(UVXY) → ln(SPVXSTER) | 9.9 | 38.2 | 51.9 | 16.2 | 39.3 | 44.4 |
| ln(VIXY) → ln(SPVXSTER) | 21.5 | 60.6 | 17.9 | 21.1 | 49.2 | 29.7 |
| ln(SPVXSTER) → ln(SVXY) | 17.8 | 69.4 | 12.8 | 28.9 | 51.0 | 20.1 |
| ln(UVXY) → ln(SVXY) | 27.6 | 66.4 | 6.0 | 43.8 | 45.7 | 10.6 |
| ln(VIXY) → ln(SVXY) | 11.0 | 79.0 | 10.0 | 24.4 | 52.8 | 22.8 |
| ln(SPVXSTER) → ln(UVXY) | 4.9 | 64.4 | 30.7 | 10.3 | 53.6 | 36.1 |
| ln(SVXY) → ln(UVXY) | 23.9 | 70.9 | 5.2 | 33.5 | 54.2 | 12.3 |
| ln(VIXY) → ln(UVXY) | 6.3 | 78.9 | 14.8 | 15.4 | 59.6 | 25.0 |
| ln(SPVXSTER-) → ln(VIXY) | 10.9 | 75.9 | 13.2 | 18.7 | 56.6 | 24.7 |
| ln(SVXY) → ln(VIXY) | 10.4 | 79.2 | 10.4 | 25.0 | 55.1 | 19.8 |
| ln(UVXY) → ln(VIXY) | 5.5 | 77.2 | 17.6 | 12.1 | 53.0 | 35.2 |
| Elasticity Full Sample: UVXY = 0.25, VIXY = 0.28 and SVXY = −0.19 3:45–4:15 p.m.: UVXY = 0.12, VIXY = 0.16 and SVXY = −0.20 | ||||||
| Panel B – VIXY, UVXY and SVXY ETFs with SPVXSTER | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Full sample | 3:45–4:15 p.m. | ||||
| Sign of coefficient | −1 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| ln(SVXY) → ln(SPVXSTER) | 24.7 | 50.9 | 24.4 | 30.8 | 46.2 | 23.0 |
| ln(UVXY) → ln(SPVXSTER) | 9.9 | 38.2 | 51.9 | 16.2 | 39.3 | 44.4 |
| ln(VIXY) → ln(SPVXSTER) | 21.5 | 60.6 | 17.9 | 21.1 | 49.2 | 29.7 |
| ln(SPVXSTER) → ln(SVXY) | 17.8 | 69.4 | 12.8 | 28.9 | 51.0 | 20.1 |
| ln(UVXY) → ln(SVXY) | 27.6 | 66.4 | 6.0 | 43.8 | 45.7 | 10.6 |
| ln(VIXY) → ln(SVXY) | 11.0 | 79.0 | 10.0 | 24.4 | 52.8 | 22.8 |
| ln(SPVXSTER) → ln(UVXY) | 4.9 | 64.4 | 30.7 | 10.3 | 53.6 | 36.1 |
| ln(SVXY) → ln(UVXY) | 23.9 | 70.9 | 5.2 | 33.5 | 54.2 | 12.3 |
| ln(VIXY) → ln(UVXY) | 6.3 | 78.9 | 14.8 | 15.4 | 59.6 | 25.0 |
| ln(SPVXSTER-) → ln(VIXY) | 10.9 | 75.9 | 13.2 | 18.7 | 56.6 | 24.7 |
| ln(SVXY) → ln(VIXY) | 10.4 | 79.2 | 10.4 | 25.0 | 55.1 | 19.8 |
| ln(UVXY) → ln(VIXY) | 5.5 | 77.2 | 17.6 | 12.1 | 53.0 | 35.2 |
| Elasticity | ||||||
Note(s): Panels A and B this table show the percentage of total number of days with significantly positive and negative coefficients for each pair using ETNs and ETFs, respectively. The model in Panel A is fitted in each day (n = 1,784) during which all ETNs traded concurrently, 29 November 2010 through 15 February 2018. The model in Panel B is fitted each day (n = 1,638) during which all ETFs traded concurrently, 3 October 2011 through 15 February 2018. The notation −1 denotes the presence of negative Granger causality, 0 denotes no Granger causality and 1 denotes positive Granger causality
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.