Table 6 Hypothesis testing Hypothesis... | Emerald Publishing

Table 6

Hypothesis testing

Hypothesis direct effects	Coefficient (β)	T-value	P-value	Standard error	Inner VIFs	Decision
H1: CEE ➔ GCA	0.642	16.219	0.000	0.040	1.166	Supported
H2: CEE ➔ FP	−0.302	3.542	0.000	0.085	2.228	Not supported
H3: CEE ➔ SP	0.657	19.520	0.000	0.034	1.166	Supported
H4: GC ➔ GCA	0.280	5.434	0.000	0.052	1.166	Supported
H5: GC ➔ FP	0.248	4.043	0.000	0.061	1.524	Supported
H6: GC ➔ SP	0.288	7.145	0.000	0.040	1.166	Supported
H7: GCA ➔ FP	0.453	6.563	0.000	0.069	2.040	Supported
H8: SP ➔ FP	0.462	6.887	0.000	0.067	2.182	Supported

Hypothesis direct effects	Coefficient (β)	T-value	P-value	Standard error	Inner VIFs	Decision
H1: CEE ➔ GCA	0.642	16.219	0.000	0.040	1.166	Supported
H2: CEE ➔ FP	−0.302	3.542	0.000	0.085	2.228	Not supported
H3: CEE ➔ SP	0.657	19.520	0.000	0.034	1.166	Supported
H4: GC ➔ GCA	0.280	5.434	0.000	0.052	1.166	Supported
H5: GC ➔ FP	0.248	4.043	0.000	0.061	1.524	Supported
H6: GC ➔ SP	0.288	7.145	0.000	0.040	1.166	Supported
H7: GCA ➔ FP	0.453	6.563	0.000	0.069	2.040	Supported
H8: SP ➔ FP	0.462	6.887	0.000	0.067	2.182	Supported

Indirect effects	Bias-corrected confidence interval (0.05–99.5%)
H9a: CEE ➔ GCA ➔ FP	0.291	6.069	0.000	0.048	0.173–0.467
H9b: GC ➔ GCA ➔ FP	0.127	4.111	0.000	0.031	0.060–0.234
H10a: CEE ➔ SP ➔ FP	0.303	6.607	0.000	0.046	0.150–0.428
H10b: GC ➔ SP ➔ FP	0.133	4.669	0.000	0.029	0.057–0.206
Control variables	0.147	2.744	0.006	0.054	−0.007–0.317

Indirect effects	Bias-corrected confidence interval (0.05–99.5%)
H9a: CEE ➔ GCA ➔ FP	0.291	6.069	0.000	0.048	0.173–0.467
H9b: GC ➔ GCA ➔ FP	0.127	4.111	0.000	0.031	0.060–0.234
H10a: CEE ➔ SP ➔ FP	0.303	6.607	0.000	0.046	0.150–0.428
H10b: GC ➔ SP ➔ FP	0.133	4.669	0.000	0.029	0.057–0.206
Control variables	0.147	2.744	0.006	0.054	−0.007–0.317

Note(s): *CEE – corporate environmental ethics; GC – green creativity; FP – financial performance; SP – sustainable production; GCA – green competitive advantage

Source(s): Authors' own work