Table 4

Assessing discriminant validity of measurement model

Constructs/DimensionsAQPQCRARURBrand co-creation behavior*
CODCOFCOACOH
Panel A: Fornell – Larcker criterion
Argument quality (AQ)0.859        
Information quantity (IQ)0.5430.806       
Cognitive response (CR)0.5620.5700.868      
Affective response (AR)0.4900.3820.4940.885     
University reputation (UR)0.5130.3590.5080.3670.861    
Brand co-creation behavior*0.4770.4250.5190.4430.6650.771   
Development (COD)0.3690.3140.3920.4360.5140.883   
Feedback (COF)0.3440.3500.4000.3410.4060.5010.896  
Advocacy (COA)0.4410.4000.4250.3580.6330.4910.4370.864 
Helping (COH)0.2990.2320.3860.2140.4660.4090.4090.5150.891
Panel B: Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT)
Argument quality (AQ)         
Information quantity (IQ)0.621        
Cognitive response (CR)0.6320.646       
Affective response (AR)0.5610.4410.562      
University reputation (UR)0.5790.4090.5700.417     
Brand co-creation behavior*0.5700.5120.6240.5350.791    
Development (COD)0.4180.3580.4400.5030.587    
Feedback (COF)0.3900.4010.4510.3890.4590.572   
Advocacy (COA)0.4980.4570.4770.4080.7150.5610.492  
Helping (COH)0.3420.2660.4370.2470.5310.4710.4670.586 

Note(s): *values for second-order constructs obtained from Step II

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal