Assessing discriminant validity of measurement model
| Constructs/Dimensions | AQ | PQ | CR | AR | UR | Brand co-creation behavior* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COD | COF | COA | COH | ||||||
| Panel A: Fornell – Larcker criterion | |||||||||
| Argument quality (AQ) | 0.859 | ||||||||
| Information quantity (IQ) | 0.543 | 0.806 | |||||||
| Cognitive response (CR) | 0.562 | 0.570 | 0.868 | ||||||
| Affective response (AR) | 0.490 | 0.382 | 0.494 | 0.885 | |||||
| University reputation (UR) | 0.513 | 0.359 | 0.508 | 0.367 | 0.861 | ||||
| Brand co-creation behavior* | 0.477 | 0.425 | 0.519 | 0.443 | 0.665 | 0.771 | |||
| Development (COD) | 0.369 | 0.314 | 0.392 | 0.436 | 0.514 | 0.883 | |||
| Feedback (COF) | 0.344 | 0.350 | 0.400 | 0.341 | 0.406 | 0.501 | 0.896 | ||
| Advocacy (COA) | 0.441 | 0.400 | 0.425 | 0.358 | 0.633 | 0.491 | 0.437 | 0.864 | |
| Helping (COH) | 0.299 | 0.232 | 0.386 | 0.214 | 0.466 | 0.409 | 0.409 | 0.515 | 0.891 |
| Panel B: Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) | |||||||||
| Argument quality (AQ) | |||||||||
| Information quantity (IQ) | 0.621 | ||||||||
| Cognitive response (CR) | 0.632 | 0.646 | |||||||
| Affective response (AR) | 0.561 | 0.441 | 0.562 | ||||||
| University reputation (UR) | 0.579 | 0.409 | 0.570 | 0.417 | |||||
| Brand co-creation behavior* | 0.570 | 0.512 | 0.624 | 0.535 | 0.791 | ||||
| Development (COD) | 0.418 | 0.358 | 0.440 | 0.503 | 0.587 | ||||
| Feedback (COF) | 0.390 | 0.401 | 0.451 | 0.389 | 0.459 | 0.572 | |||
| Advocacy (COA) | 0.498 | 0.457 | 0.477 | 0.408 | 0.715 | 0.561 | 0.492 | ||
| Helping (COH) | 0.342 | 0.266 | 0.437 | 0.247 | 0.531 | 0.471 | 0.467 | 0.586 | |
| Constructs/Dimensions | AQ | PQ | CR | AR | UR | Brand co-creation behavior* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COD | COF | COA | COH | ||||||
| Argument quality (AQ) | 0.859 | ||||||||
| Information quantity (IQ) | 0.543 | 0.806 | |||||||
| Cognitive response (CR) | 0.562 | 0.570 | 0.868 | ||||||
| Affective response (AR) | 0.490 | 0.382 | 0.494 | 0.885 | |||||
| University reputation (UR) | 0.513 | 0.359 | 0.508 | 0.367 | 0.861 | ||||
| 0.477 | 0.425 | 0.519 | 0.443 | 0.665 | 0.771 | ||||
| Development (COD) | 0.369 | 0.314 | 0.392 | 0.436 | 0.514 | 0.883 | |||
| Feedback (COF) | 0.344 | 0.350 | 0.400 | 0.341 | 0.406 | 0.501 | 0.896 | ||
| Advocacy (COA) | 0.441 | 0.400 | 0.425 | 0.358 | 0.633 | 0.491 | 0.437 | 0.864 | |
| Helping (COH) | 0.299 | 0.232 | 0.386 | 0.214 | 0.466 | 0.409 | 0.409 | 0.515 | 0.891 |
| Argument quality (AQ) | |||||||||
| Information quantity (IQ) | 0.621 | ||||||||
| Cognitive response (CR) | 0.632 | 0.646 | |||||||
| Affective response (AR) | 0.561 | 0.441 | 0.562 | ||||||
| University reputation (UR) | 0.579 | 0.409 | 0.570 | 0.417 | |||||
| 0.570 | 0.512 | 0.624 | 0.535 | 0.791 | |||||
| Development (COD) | 0.418 | 0.358 | 0.440 | 0.503 | 0.587 | ||||
| Feedback (COF) | 0.390 | 0.401 | 0.451 | 0.389 | 0.459 | 0.572 | |||
| Advocacy (COA) | 0.498 | 0.457 | 0.477 | 0.408 | 0.715 | 0.561 | 0.492 | ||
| Helping (COH) | 0.342 | 0.266 | 0.437 | 0.247 | 0.531 | 0.471 | 0.467 | 0.586 | |
Note(s): *values for second-order constructs obtained from Step II
Source(s): Table by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.