Table 4.

Negative media coverage of ESG and ESG performance

Dependent variableESG score(t)ESG score(t)ESG score(t)ESG score (t + 1)ESG score (t + 1)ESG score (t + 1)
Constant−0.939 (9.554)−1.317 (9.566)−1.101 (9.589)7.238 (9.859)4.653 (9.873)5.729 (9.901)
NegM_peak_FY0.151 (0.488)  0.704 (0.557)  
NegM_peak_Q4 0.017 (0.448)  −0.209 (0.507) 
NegM_peak_Q4Q1  0.079 (0.419)  0.129 (0.471)
Size3.344*** (0.446)3.374*** (0.446)3.358*** (0.447)3.081*** (0.468)3.287*** (0.468)3.204*** (0.469)
Leverage−2.323 (3.249)−2.333 (3.249)−2.339 (3.251)0.903 (3.591)0.800 (3.594)0.840 (3.595)
Profitability9.288** (4.198)9.292** (4.198)9.279** (4.197)4.441 (4.664)4.435 (4.666)4.463 (4.664)
Cash−8.795** (3.762)−8.801** (3.763)−8.789** (3.762)−6.059 (4.129)−5.964 (4.132)−6.022 (4.131)
MTBV0.119 (0.103)0.119 (0.103)0.119 (0.103)0.003 (0.113)0.003 (0.113)0.004 (0.113)
Industry FEYesYesYesYesYesYes
Country FEYesYesYesYesYesYes
Year FEYesYesYesYesYesYes
N2,2532,2532,2531,8111,8111,811
R2 (overall)0.1410.1410.1410.1330.1290.131
Wald Chi2387.2***387.1***387.2***195.5***193.8***193.6***
Max VIF1.801.861.841.801.861.84

Notes:

Standard errors in parentheses. Size, Leverage, Profitability, Cash and MTBV are winsorised at the 1st and 99th percentiles; ***, ** and * indicate significance levels at 1, 5 and 10%, respectively

Source: Authors own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options