Table 6. Comparison of stress... | Emerald Publishing

Table 6.

Comparison of stress normalisation methods

Sand	$Q_{tn} - ψ_{cc}$ R²	$Q_{p} - ψ_{cc}$ R²	$λ_{10}$	Range of $K_{0}$	Range of state parameter $ψ$	Vertical effective stress, $σ_{v}^{'}$ : kPa
Da Nang	0.67	0.91	0.073	0.38–1.77	−0.243, −0.022	38–160
Erksak	0.53	0.92	0.044	0.69–1.00	−0.229, −0.069	30–374
Hilton Mines Tailings	0.63	0.91	0.170	0.37–0.51	−0.340, −0.035	51–272
Hokksund	0.65	0.66	0.054	0.31–0.51	−0.296, 0.045	57–402
Ottawa	0.86	0.95	0.028	0.34–0.50	−0.171, 0.026	51–294
Syncrude oil tailings	0.72	0.86	0.065	0.50–0.51	−0.227, −0.022	50–600
Ticino 4	0.83	0.79	0.056	0.39–0.64	−0.296, −0.001	41–515
Ticino 9	0.80	0.88	0.05	0.50–1.00	−0.243, 0.016	45–450
Toyoura 160	0.89	0.86	0.044	0.36–0.49	−0.268, −0.041	51–295
Average	0.73	0.86

Sand	$Q_{tn} - ψ_{cc}$ R²	$Q_{p} - ψ_{cc}$ R²	$λ_{10}$	Range of $K_{0}$	Range of state parameter $ψ$	Vertical effective stress, $σ_{v}^{'}$ : kPa
Da Nang	0.67	0.91	0.073	0.38–1.77	−0.243, −0.022	38–160
Erksak	0.53	0.92	0.044	0.69–1.00	−0.229, −0.069	30–374
Hilton Mines Tailings	0.63	0.91	0.170	0.37–0.51	−0.340, −0.035	51–272
Hokksund	0.65	0.66	0.054	0.31–0.51	−0.296, 0.045	57–402
Ottawa	0.86	0.95	0.028	0.34–0.50	−0.171, 0.026	51–294
Syncrude oil tailings	0.72	0.86	0.065	0.50–0.51	−0.227, −0.022	50–600
Ticino 4	0.83	0.79	0.056	0.39–0.64	−0.296, −0.001	41–515
Ticino 9	0.80	0.88	0.05	0.50–1.00	−0.243, 0.016	45–450
Toyoura 160	0.89	0.86	0.044	0.36–0.49	−0.268, −0.041	51–295
Average	0.73	0.86