Table 3

Hypothesis testing results

VariablesPOS (mediator 1)AC (mediator 2)WE
(criterion variable)
Total effectsBSEBSEBSE
Constant2.13***0.33
SR-HRM0.63***0.07
Age0.010.01
Managerial positiona0.60***0.13
Organization sizeb0.060.06
     F(4, 217) = 31.48; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.37
Direct effects      
Constant0.720.381.12***0.281.47***0.30
SR-HRM1.17***0.090.140.090.29***0.09
POS0.39***0.050.070.06
AC0.43***0.07
Age−0.02***0.010.01*0.000.010.00
Managerial positiona0.42**0.150.020.110.49***0.12
Organization sizeb0.18**0.07−0.11*0.050.070.05
 F(4, 217) = 58.78; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.52F(5, 216) = 37.56; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.42F(6, 215) = 36.32; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.50
Indirect effectsEffect (ES)BootLLCIBootULCI
Total0.34 (0.07)0.200.49
SR-HRM > POS > WE0.09 (0.07)−0.040.21
SR-HRM > AC > WE0.06 (0.04)−0.020.14
SR-HRM > POS > AC > WE0.19 (0.05)0.110.30

Notes:

p = 0.06; p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; amanagerial position: 0 = no, 1 = yes; borganization size: ranges from 1 (less than 10 employees) to 4 (more than 250 employees); POS = perceived organizational support; AC = affective commitment; WE = work engagement; B = unstandardized coefficient; SE = standard error; SR-HRM = socially responsible human resource management; ES = effect size; BootLLCI = bootstrap lower limit confidence interval; BootULCI = bootstrap lower limit confidence interval

Source: Created by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal